Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Framework for Licensed and Non-Licensed Asbestos Removal

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018019-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
24 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Gateshead Council is looking to appoint an asbestos removal contractor. The contractor will be required to carry out Licensed & Non-Licensed Asbestos Removal Works to domestic properties, schools and public buildings.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds listed, but implied that bidders must not be subject to exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be an asbestos removal contractor.
--Must be capable of carrying out Licensed & Non-Licensed Asbestos Removal Works.
--Works will be to domestic properties, schools and public buildings.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be capable of carrying out Licensed & Non-Licensed Asbestos Removal Works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for asbestos removal services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific financial requirements and detailed evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. The deadline is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The 'planning' status suggests it's in an early stage, which is acceptable.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required services (licensed and non-licensed asbestos removal for various property types) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements, while not fully detailed, outline the core eligibility and technical capabilities needed. The main clarity issue stems from the lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a description. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of specific financial and submission requirements, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No specific financial requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on the contractor's capability to perform asbestos removal. The lack of disclosed value and specific financial requirements could be a concern for some bidders, but the overall approach is not tailored to specific companies.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the availability of document content (only 4 documents are listed, but their content is not accessible) hinders practicality. Financing information is also not provided.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical in sequence.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Defined scope of work
Proper CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific financial and submission requirements
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria
No document content available
No explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Provide specific financial and submission requirements.
3. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline