Skip to main content
Tenders

UKPHR Specialist Registration by Portfolio Route London Support Offer

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027066-2026
Value
£75,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£75,000
Duration
36 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

NHS England (NHSE) is seeking a single supplier to support the London Public Health Practitioner Enhanced Support Programme, which aids professionals pursuing UKPHR Specialist Registration through mentoring, portfolio development guidance, and tailored support. The maximum financial envelope for this procurement is £75,000 (excluding VAT), at £25,000 ex VAT per year for a duration of three years, with no optional extension. The deadline for completed ITQ submissions is April 14, 2026, at 12:00 noon. Late submissions will not be accepted. All communications must be made via the e-Tendering portal's messaging function. To express interest and access tender documentation, use the link: https://health-family-contract-search.secure.force.com/?SearchType=Projects. For queries or portal issues, contact the Atamis Helpdesk: Phone: 0800 9956035 or E-mail: support-health@atamis.co.uk.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Completed ITQ submissions must be submitted by 14th April 2026 at 12:00 noon (midday).
--Late submissions will not be accepted.
--All communications should be made via the messaging function on the e-Tendering portal.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a single supplier.
--Must be able to support the delivery of the London Public Health Practitioner Enhanced Support Programme.
--Must provide mentoring, portfolio development guidance, and tailored support for professionals pursuing UKPHR Specialist Registration.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be able to provide mentoring services.
--Must be able to provide portfolio development guidance.
--Must be able to provide tailored support for professionals pursuing UKPHR Specialist Registration.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Maximum financial envelope: £75,000 Exclusive of VAT.
--Maximum annual spend: £25,000 ex VAT per year.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear description of a specialized support program with a defined budget and duration. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting overall transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles for below-threshold procedures. Deadlines are stated, and the CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. The procedure is described as 'open competition' which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required (mentoring, portfolio development, tailored support for UKPHR Specialist Registration) is clear. The financial envelope and duration are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline is clear. However, the lack of accessible tender documentation content is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open competition, and the value is disclosed. The use of an e-tendering portal for communication and submission is a positive aspect. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a reasonable level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies an e-submission process via a portal, which is practical. A contract start date is provided. However, the link provided for accessing tender documents is a general search portal, and the absence of direct document URLs or specific financing details beyond the total envelope limits practicality.

No e-submission (direct link to documents)
General link to tender portal instead of direct document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The contract start date is after the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided text. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of service requirements
Defined financial envelope and contract duration
Use of e-tendering portal for communication

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible tender document content
General link to tender portal instead of direct document access

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria for bidders to understand assessment methods.
2. Make tender documentation directly accessible via a clear link or attachment.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria if applicable to the program's goals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline