Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of photo and video equipment

Open
Deadline
39 days left
May 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168786
Value
€41,999
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 28, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 05, 2026

Tender Opening

May 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€41,999
Duration
24 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€94,756
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
1,002 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of photo and video equipment

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Offers must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-05-05T09:00:00
--Submission forms, eligibility criteria, and evaluation methods are detailed in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168786_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324052632.pdf -- 100.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the purchase of photo and video equipment by Rīga Stradiņš University, detailing submission forms, eligibility criteria, and evaluation methods.

Nolikums ar līgumuDOC
5_pielikums_LIGUMA PROJEKTS_55_2026.docx -- 38.3 KB

This document contains a purchase agreement for the acquisition of photo and video equipment by Rīga Stradiņš University, detailing the subject matter, payment terms, and delivery procedures.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the purchase of photo and video equipment by Rīga Stradiņš University, with a deadline for submission of offers on May 5, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for photo and video equipment is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes are reported. The procedure is open, which is standard. The main area for improvement is ensuring full regulatory compliance regarding document accessibility.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key information like estimated value, deadlines, and contract duration are specified. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the summary makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their offers will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, estimated value, and deadlines. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section is notably sparse, indicating that crucial details regarding mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are likely contained within the attached documents, which are not fully accessible or summarized here.

Limited summary of mandatory/eligibility/technical/financial requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure and uses e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue is a significant concern, as it may prevent potential bidders from accessing all necessary information to prepare a competitive offer, potentially limiting fairness. The lack of specified evaluation criteria also impacts objective assessment.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a clear submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests that the submission process might not be fully electronic, which could reduce practicality. Information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

No e-submission (implied)
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced. The tender is active and has a valid period.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable submission deadline
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure and e-procurement

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Limited summary of detailed requirements
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline