Skip to main content
Tenders

Aids and adaptations to dwellings and access to dwellings

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
017926-2026
Value
£720,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 21, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£720,000
Duration
24 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Aids and adaptations to dwellings and access to dwellings owned and managed by Redditch Borough Council

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for aids and adaptations to dwellings is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of a below-threshold open competition. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the absence of flags.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the basic information is well-documented. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the lack of specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the absence of document content significantly detract from completeness.

No specific requirements listed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition with a disclosed value, promoting fairness. The deadlines are reasonable for the scope. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation could be a concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of detailed document content make the submission process less practical for bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Value and deadline disclosed
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific requirements detailed
Lack of document content
No e-submission mentioned

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and attach full tender documents to improve completeness and practicality.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline