Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Expansion of SSD disk clusters

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
164106
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 08, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Financial Proposal EvaluationPrice
Technical Proposal EvaluationTechnical
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 08, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€48,914
Avg. Bids
2.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
2,001 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Expansion of SSD disk clusters

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for SSD cluster expansion by the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre requires a technically proficient bidder with a strong financial standing and impeccable compliance. The absence of specified evaluation criteria necessitates a focus on exceeding all stated requirements and demonstrating superior value through technical excellence and robust support.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Reliability and Performance: Delivering a seamless, high-performance SSD cluster expansion with guaranteed uptime and data integrity.

Expertise in Defence-Grade Infrastructure: Proven ability to meet the stringent security and operational demands of defence logistics.

Key Opportunities
The absence of explicit evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define perceived value through superior technical proposals and robust support offerings.
The 12-month duration suggests a need for a solution that is not only effective but also easily manageable and maintainable, allowing for a focus on long-term operational efficiency.
The CPV code (30234500) indicates a specific focus on storage devices, allowing for highly specialized and optimized technical proposals.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid to maximize scoring. Bidders must infer the most important factors.

Focus on exceeding all stated mandatory and technical requirements. Emphasize aspects that are typically critical for defence procurement: reliability, security, performance, and long-term support. Present a comprehensive and well-structured proposal that clearly articulates the benefits and value proposition.

Potential for high competition due to the nature of defence procurement and the specific technical requirement.

Differentiate through superior technical specifications, a more robust warranty and support plan, and a demonstrably smoother data migration and integration process. Highlight any unique capabilities or partnerships that offer added value.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established IT infrastructure provider with proven experience in deploying and managing large-scale SSD storage solutions, particularly within public sector or defence-related environments. The ideal bidder possesses strong financial stability, a comprehensive understanding of data migration and integration, and offers exceptional post-installation support and warranty services.
Key Requirements
Demonstrate experience in expanding SSD disk clusters
Provide technical specifications of the proposed SSD disks
Detail installation and configuration methodology
Provide a plan for data migration and integration
Offer a warranty and support service for the expanded clusters
Demonstrate financial stability and solvency
Adhere to the specified deadline for submission
Ensure no mandatory exclusion grounds are met
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable experience with defence sector IT infrastructure and security protocols.
A proactive and comprehensive data migration and integration plan that minimizes disruption.
An exceptionally strong warranty and support package that goes beyond the minimum requirements, offering rapid response times and expert on-site support.
Proposed SSD disks with superior performance metrics (e.g., IOPS, latency) and proven reliability in demanding environments.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the support and maintenance phases of the contract, if feasible and aligned with company policy. This can be a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability Requirements

Provide highly detailed and specific technical specifications for the proposed SSD disks, ensuring they meet or exceed industry best practices for performance and reliability. The installation, configuration, data migration, and integration plans should be meticulously detailed, outlining clear methodologies, timelines, and risk mitigation strategies. The warranty and support plan should be comprehensive, highlighting rapid response times and expert technical assistance.

Financial Requirements

Present clear and concise financial statements for the last three years, demonstrating strong financial stability and solvency. Ensure the bank guarantee or equivalent security is readily available and meets any specified value or format requirements.

Exclusion and Eligibility Requirements

Thoroughly review and address all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all documentation is complete, accurate, and submitted in the correct format and language. Proactive verification of compliance is crucial.

Recommendations5
Develop a Superior Technical Solution
CriticalHigh effort

Go beyond simply meeting the technical requirements. Propose SSD disks with demonstrably superior performance, endurance, and reliability. Detail an installation, configuration, and integration methodology that prioritizes minimal downtime and seamless operation. The data migration plan should be robust, addressing potential challenges and ensuring data integrity.

Significantly increases the perceived value and technical superiority of the bid, especially in the absence of explicit evaluation criteria.
Craft a Comprehensive Warranty and Support Plan
CriticalMed effort

Offer a warranty and support service that exceeds standard offerings. This could include faster response times, on-site support options, proactive monitoring, and extended warranty periods. Clearly articulate the benefits of this superior support.

Addresses a critical aspect of long-term operational success for the contracting authority and provides a strong differentiator.
Highlight Defence Sector Experience
HighMed effort

If the bidder has experience with defence logistics or similar government procurement, explicitly showcase this. Emphasize understanding of security protocols, operational continuity, and the specific needs of defence organizations.

Builds trust and demonstrates a deeper understanding of the client's environment, potentially outweighing minor price differences.
Meticulous Compliance and Documentation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure absolute adherence to all submission requirements, including language, format, and deadline. Double-check all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility criteria. Any oversight here can lead to immediate disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered on its merits.
Proactive Data Migration and Integration Planning
HighHigh effort

Develop a detailed, phased plan for data migration and integration that clearly outlines steps, timelines, potential risks, and mitigation strategies. This should include contingency plans for unexpected issues.

Demonstrates foresight and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority, enhancing confidence in the bidder's capability.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and technically advanced solution, emphasizing long-term operational efficiency and minimal risk. Highlight superior support and warranty as a key value-add, especially given the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, allowing the bidder to implicitly define what constitutes 'best value'.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (3)
Compliance (3)
Technical (5)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--[Requirement for bidders to submit their offer in the official language of the tender or an official language of the European Union]
--[Requirement for bidders to submit their offer electronically through the designated platform]
--[Requirement for bidders to include all required documents and forms as specified in the tender documents]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--[Requirement for bidders to not be in a situation of conflict of interest]
--[Requirement for bidders to not have been convicted of fraud, corruption, or other criminal offenses]
--[Requirement for bidders to not have been declared bankrupt or be in liquidation]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--[Requirement for bidders to be registered in their country of establishment]
--[Requirement for bidders to have the legal capacity to enter into contracts]
--[Requirement for bidders to have a valid tax registration]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--[Requirement for bidders to demonstrate experience in expanding SSD disk clusters]
--[Requirement for bidders to provide technical specifications of the proposed SSD disks]
--[Requirement for bidders to detail their installation and configuration methodology]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--[Requirement for bidders to demonstrate financial stability and solvency]
--[Requirement for bidders to provide financial statements for the last three years]
--[Requirement for bidders to provide a bank guarantee or equivalent security]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
164106_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260308120939.pdf -- 99.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the expansion of SSD disk clusters, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical, and financial proposal requirements.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_2026_011.docx -- 117.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure by the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre for the expansion of SSD disk clusters.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the expansion of SSD disk clusters, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for SSD disk cluster expansion is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure rules, includes a proper CPV code, and has no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the active status and procedure type.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are concise. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expected bidder qualifications and technical capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how offers will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and organizational details. Three tender documents are available, covering requirements and regulations. The main missing piece is the estimated financial value of the contract.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. Requirements are generally objective and focused on capability. The primary concern is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which could limit full document access for potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is set up for e-submission, which is positive. The contract duration is specified. However, financing information is not disclosed, and the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks section contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, indicating a potential discrepancy or misunderstanding in the extracted data.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear open procedure and e-procurement characteristics
Detailed technical and eligibility requirements
Reasonable submission deadline and contract duration
Availability of key tender documents

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to attract more bidders.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for assessing bids.
3. Clarify the document access policy and ensure full accessibility.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline