Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Conducting a course - Driving license category B (Żary County)

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00172922/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubuskie, Poland
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubuskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,802
Avg. Bids
0.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
53%
6,312 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Conducting a course - Driving license category B (Żary County)

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Category B driving courses in the Żary district presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating robust operational capability and cost-effectiveness, leveraging the lack of specified evaluation criteria to emphasize core strengths. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority for clarification is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Experienced Local Driving Education Provider

Cost-Effective and High-Quality Driving Instruction

Commitment to Safe and Competent Driver Training

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for emphasis on core strengths and competitive pricing.
Opportunity to proactively define value proposition and address potential bidder concerns through clarification requests.
Potential for a strong local presence to be a significant advantage, even if not explicitly stated.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed tender requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) creates ambiguity and requires proactive information gathering.

Submit formal clarification requests to the Contracting Authority (ZWIĄZEK POWIATÓW LUBUSKICH) to obtain all missing details regarding eligibility, technical capabilities, financial stability, and submission formats. This also demonstrates diligence.

Unspecified evaluation criteria make it difficult to tailor the bid for maximum scoring.

Assume a balanced approach focusing on demonstrable capability, competitive pricing, and operational efficiency. Highlight experience and quality of service as key selling points. Prepare to justify all aspects of the offer.

Potential for a highly competitive market due to the nature of the service (driving school).

Focus on differentiation through superior instructor quality, modern training methods (even if not explicitly innovative), and a strong local reputation. Offer competitive pricing without compromising quality.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established driving school with a strong local presence in the Żary district or surrounding areas, possessing a proven track record of delivering high-quality Category B driving courses. The ideal bidder will have a fleet of well-maintained vehicles, qualified instructors, and efficient administrative processes. They should also be financially stable and capable of offering competitive pricing.
Key Requirements
Demonstration of capability to conduct Category B driving courses.
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds (though not specified, this is a standard requirement).
Understanding and adherence to local regulations for driving schools in the Żary district.
Ability to provide a comprehensive offer, including pricing and operational plan.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated local community engagement and understanding of the Żary district's specific needs for driver training.
A fleet of modern, well-maintained vehicles suitable for driving instruction.
A team of highly qualified and experienced instructors with a proven track record of successful student outcomes.
A streamlined and efficient administrative process for course management and student support.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to offering a limited number of subsidized training slots for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds or long-term unemployed within the Żary district, demonstrating social responsibility and community support.
Bid Focus Areas
Demonstrated Capability and Experience

Provide detailed evidence of past successful Category B driving courses, including statistics on pass rates, student feedback, and instructor qualifications. Highlight experience in the local area if applicable.

Pricing and Value for Money

Develop a competitive pricing structure that reflects the quality of service offered. Clearly articulate the value proposition, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of the course and the expertise of instructors.

Operational Excellence

Outline a clear and efficient operational plan, including vehicle maintenance schedules, instructor availability, and student scheduling processes. Demonstrate robust risk management for operational continuity.

Recommendations6
Proactive Clarification of Tender Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Submit formal clarification requests to ZWIĄZEK POWIATÓW LUBUSKICH to obtain missing details on eligibility, technical capability, financial requirements, and submission format. This is essential due to the lack of information provided.

Ensures full understanding of the tender, prevents disqualification, and allows for a tailored bid.
Assume Balanced Evaluation and Emphasize Core Strengths
HighMed effort

Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, assume a balanced approach. Focus on demonstrating robust operational capability, experienced instructors, a well-maintained fleet, and competitive pricing. Highlight quality and reliability.

Maximizes chances of meeting unstated but likely important evaluation factors.
Leverage Local Presence and Community Understanding
HighMed effort

If bidding as a local provider, emphasize deep understanding of the Żary district's specific needs, local traffic conditions, and community engagement. If not local, highlight adaptability and commitment to serving the area effectively.

Creates a strong connection with the contracting authority and differentiates from potentially less localized competitors.
Develop a Detailed and Competitive Pricing Strategy
HighHigh effort

Conduct thorough market research to understand competitor pricing for similar services in the region. Develop a pricing model that is competitive yet sustainable, clearly justifying the cost based on the quality and scope of services offered.

Directly influences the bid's attractiveness and potential for winning.
Incorporate a Targeted Social Value Commitment
MediumLow effort

Propose a specific social value initiative, such as offering subsidized training for specific community groups in the Żary district. This demonstrates a commitment beyond just service delivery.

Enhances the bid's appeal, particularly if the contracting authority has unstated social objectives.
Prepare for Potential Unforeseen Requirements
HighMed effort

Anticipate that the contracting authority may have standard requirements not explicitly stated. Prepare documentation and information that would typically be required for such a tender (e.g., insurance certificates, instructor certifications, vehicle registration).

Reduces the risk of last-minute issues and demonstrates preparedness.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and experienced provider of Category B driving courses in the Żary district, emphasizing a proven track record of producing safe and competent drivers.
Highlight cost-effectiveness by demonstrating efficient operations and value for money, without compromising on the quality of instruction or vehicle standards.
Emphasize a commitment to student success through personalized instruction and a supportive learning environment, setting a higher standard of service delivery.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b23-7382-8be5-5fad-950001e7102e.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for a driving school course for category B licenses in the Żary district, with evaluation criteria based on price and completion time.

zał. nr 1 do SWZ Formularz oferty.docxDOC
zał. nr 1 do SWZ Formularz oferty.docx -- 793.1 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 2 do SWZ - Opis przedmiotu zamówienia.docxDOC
Zał. nr 2 do SWZ - Opis przedmiotu zamówienia... -- 794.3 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for driving school services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The submission deadline is active. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential issues with deadline reasonableness (given the short timeframe) are noted.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is appropriate. The availability of multiple documents, including a contract template and offer form, contributes to clarity. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, and financial requirements leaves some ambiguity.

No eligibility requirements specified
No technical capability requirements specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, and deadline is present. Several relevant documents are attached. However, crucial details like estimated value, contract duration, and specific financial/technical requirements are missing, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for transparency. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could lead to subjective assessments. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit information regarding contract start date, financing details, and contract duration makes it less practical for potential bidders to fully assess their commitment.

No e-submission (implied, as not explicitly stated)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The CPV code is appropriate for the service.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code (800000004)
Active e-procurement process
Comprehensive set of attached documents (SWZ, offer form, contract template)
Clear title and description

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline