Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction works for the first construction phase - shaping of the Laveru polder pumping station "Laveri" reservoir

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
166970
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction works for the first construction phase - shaping of the Laveru polder pumping station "Laveri" reservoir
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must adhere to all stipulations for the construction of the Laveru polder pumping station's storage basin.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet selection criteria as detailed in the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical proposal requirements are specified in the tender documents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal requirements are specified in the tender documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 2.versijaPDF
166970_PD.ANY_1_2_1_20260316095709.pdf -- 99.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other stipulations for the construction of the Laveru polder pumping station's storage basin.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_Laveru_pārbūve_2026_11_ELFLA.docx -- 205.9 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement procedure for construction works related to the formation of a storage basin for the Laveru pumping station, funded by ELFLA.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166970_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260312222328.pdf -- 99.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the construction of a pumping station's storage basin, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender for construction works related to the formation of a reservoir for the Laveru pumping station, announced on March 12, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction works is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria. The process is largely compliant with e-procurement standards.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can impact legal compliance if not clearly defined within the tender documents. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented across multiple technical specification documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or summary reduces overall clarity for bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While deadlines and duration are specified, the lack of financial transparency impacts completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access for all potential bidders, which is a significant concern for fairness. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria also raises questions about objective assessment.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, facilitating online submission. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is provided. The primary drawback is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which hinders practical preparation for potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically ordered. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'ELFLA' funding, which often implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Active e-procurement process
Clear technical specifications available
Reasonable submission deadline
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline