Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Boligselskabet Viborg Amt

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00201263-2026
Value
kr4,000,000
Location
Midtjylland, Denmark
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Budget
kr4,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Midtjylland
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Total advisory services

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details regarding evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. The procedure type is indicated as 'Open Procedure'. However, the absence of a reveal date and specific evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks if not clarified in the full tender documents.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description are concise. The estimated value and CPV code are provided. However, the lack of explicit requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects means that clarity on these crucial areas is deferred to the attached documents, which are not fully accessible for content review.

No specific requirements listed for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. However, critical details like contract duration and specific evaluation criteria are missing from the summary. The accessibility of full document content is also a concern.

Missing contract duration
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement is indicated. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation could be a concern if not detailed in the full documents.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement' and provides a deadline. However, it lacks information on the contract start date and duration. The submission process is not fully detailed, and the availability of full document content is not guaranteed through direct access.

No e-submission details
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated consistently. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value, deadline)
Open procedure type indicated
CPV code provided
E-procurement characteristic noted

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Limited visibility into full document content and specific requirements

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
2. Specify contract duration and start date.
3. Ensure full document content is readily accessible for potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline