Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of various high-fidelity simulators

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
166997
Value
€677,500
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 22, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€677,500
Duration
12 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of various high-fidelity simulators

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (7)
Financial (7)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Mandatory application forms for Part 1 are included.
--Confirmation of third-party or subcontractor involvement is required via a specific form.
--Submission deadline: 2026-04-07T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in documents for Part 2, Part 3, Part 5, and Part 7.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied through selection criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Technical specifications for Part 1 are detailed.
--Specific requirements for High-Fidelity Simulator No. 2 are detailed in Part 2.
--Requirements for Part 4 (license with simulated patient ventilator system) are outlined.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS7
--Financial requirements for Part 1 are detailed.
--Financial proposal requirements for Part 2 are detailed.
--Financial proposal requirements for Part 4 are detailed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Nolikums un tā pielikumiDOC
10_pielikums_Pers_uz_kuru_iesp_balst_2026_47_... -- 18.1 KB

This document is a form for a third party or subcontractor to confirm their involvement in a tender for the procurement of high-fidelity simulators.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322130329.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for Part 1 of a tender for the procurement of high-fidelity simulators by Rīga Stradiņš University, including mandatory application forms and technical specifications.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260322130330.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for Part 2 of the tender, focusing on the High-Fidelity Simulator No. 2, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_3_20260322130330.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for the third part of a tender concerning the acquisition of high-fidelity simulators, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 4.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_4_20260322130330.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for Part 4 of the procurement of various high-fidelity simulators by Riga Stradins University, specifically for a license with a simulated patient ventilator system.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 5.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_5_20260322130330.pdf -- 95.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for Part 5 of a tender, specifically for the acquisition of a military medical trauma mannequin for physiotherapy and first aid, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 6.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_6_20260322130330.pdf -- 95.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the procurement of various high-reliability simulators, specifically for the rehabilitation patient auscultation system, part 6 of the tender.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 7.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_7_20260322130331.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for Part 7 of a tender concerning the purchase of various high-fidelity simulators, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure by Rīga Stradiņš University for the procurement of various high-fidelity simulators, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for high-fidelity simulators is generally well-structured, with clear documentation for most parts. However, a lack of explicit evaluation criteria and potential document access restrictions are noted concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure rules and provides a CPV code (though it's a broad category 0). Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The requirements for each part of the tender are generally clear and detailed in separate documents. However, the AI extraction notes a lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which could impact bidder understanding.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. The tender is divided into parts, with specific technical specifications provided for most. However, the AI extraction flags potential restricted document access.

Potential restricted document access noted
Fairness85/100

The use of an open procedure and e-procurement increases fairness. Value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. While specific requirements for each part are detailed, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness issue. No direct tailoring to specific companies is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the AI extraction notes 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and needs clarification. Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned. Financing information is not detailed.

Contradiction: E-Procurement noted, but 'No e-submission' flagged
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, reference, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The AI extraction notes 'No e-submission' alongside 'E-Procurement', which is a minor inconsistency requiring clarification.

Inconsistency between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' flag
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information.

Lack of green procurement considerations
Absence of social or innovation criteria

Strengths

Open procurement procedure
Detailed technical specifications per part
Reasonable submission deadline
E-Procurement implementation

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential document access restrictions
Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria within tender documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to potential bidders.
3. Confirm and clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline