Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Bakerloo Line Upgrade Stage 1 Infrastructure Works

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
024218-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 22, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 08, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
89 months
Location
London
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Bakerloo Line runs through London from Harrow & Wealdstone, in the North, to Elephant & Castle in the centre with plans to extend South as part of the Bakerloo Line Extension initiative. The Bakerloo line fleet (72 Tube Stock) is now the oldest rolling stock operating in the UK with considerable costs to life-extend the fleet and significant risks to reduction in reliability. TfL therefore intends to introduce the new rolling stock onto the Bakerloo Line. The BLU Stage 1 Infrastructure works are required modify and upgrading the line's infrastructure to enable the introduction of the new rolling stock with the works expected to completed by, circa 2034. The core elements of the scope include: • Reconstructing Stonebridge Park Depot to consolidate all maintenance activities. • Expanding Queen's Park Area to deliver additional stabling capacity. • Modifying London Road Sidings to retain and minimally adapt existing facilities for continued stabling usage, as well as introducing a Driver's Training Facility. • Waysides works to ensure the line's power supply, signalling systems and potentially gauging is compliant with the new rolling stock. This is a refinement of the scope presented during TfL's previous 2024 BLU Early Market Engagement with the current scope having moved the cleaning shed from London Road to Stonebridge Park and no longer required the cleaning shed at the front end of the programme. . A high-level summary of assets within the scope of this works is provided below: • DC Power • HV Power • LV power supply • Stations & Property • Platform Train Interface • Civils & Structures • Track • Signalling & communications • Depot maintenance sheds, fan roads & Stabling TfL are currently envisioning three competitions to deliver the scope. These three competitions are to appoint a: 1. Depots and Sidings Partner 2. Waysides Partner 3. Integrator

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (11)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be prepared to submit proposals for one of three distinct roles: Depots and Sidings Partner, Waysides Partner, or Integrator.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None specified in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Ability to reconstruct Stonebridge Park Depot to consolidate all maintenance activities.
--Ability to expand Queen's Park Area to deliver additional stabling capacity.
--Ability to modify London Road Sidings for continued stabling usage and introduce a Driver's Training Facility.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This planned tender for the Bakerloo Line Upgrade Stage 1 Infrastructure Works is generally well-structured, with a clear description of works and specified technical capabilities. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial information, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline for a project of this scale. No disputes are noted. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project and the required works is detailed and understandable. Technical capability requirements are clearly outlined, providing bidders with a good understanding of what is expected. However, the absence of evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender outlines clear technical requirements and proposes a structured approach with three distinct partner roles, promoting fair competition. The deadline appears reasonable, and the process is generally objective. Full document access is assumed but not explicitly confirmed.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information on e-submission methods and financing details reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, CPV, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is a missed opportunity for a project of this magnitude.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description
Well-defined technical capability requirements
Structured approach with distinct partner roles
Appropriate CPV code and contract duration

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
No e-submission specified

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Specify the e-submission method.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline