Skip to main content
Tenders

Digital Media Buying Services

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023311-2026
Value
£4,105,870
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
£4,105,870
Duration
36 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This opportunity is for an agency to design and deliver digital advertising campaigns, negotiate competitive media packages, manage media bookings and oversee relationships with media owners through to the delivery of all advertising activity.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Design and deliver digital advertising campaigns
--Negotiate competitive media packages
--Manage media bookings
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Digital Media Buying Services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more practical.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are reported. The absence of specific regulatory compliance details prevents a higher score.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear and understandable. The technical capability requirements are listed, providing a good overview of expected skills. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of specific financial or submission requirements leave gaps in completeness.

No document content available
Missing financial requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria are objective in principle, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess fairness. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents hinders practicality. The submission deadline is also relatively short.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which limits its sustainability score. These aspects are not integrated into the requirements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value specified
CPV code provided
Open procedure indicated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of e-submission details
Limited sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide content for tender documents and clarify e-submission procedures.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into the requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline