Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Delivery of a used minibus to the Vecumnieki Association Administration

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168995
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€168,348
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,060 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of a used minibus to the Vecumnieki Association Administration

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires the delivery of a used minibus meeting specific technical criteria. Success hinges on demonstrating compliance with technical specifications, ensuring legal eligibility, and presenting a competitive price. While social value and innovation are not explicitly required, focusing on reliability and prompt delivery can be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable Delivery of Compliant Used Minibus

Value for Money Through Quality and Efficiency

Key Opportunities
The absence of explicit evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to influence perceived value through a well-structured bid that emphasizes compliance and competitive pricing.
The short duration (2 months) suggests a need for a bidder with readily available stock and efficient logistics, which can be a competitive advantage.
The focus on a 'used' minibus implies a potential for cost savings for the contracting authority, allowing for competitive pricing strategies.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring. The bid must assume a balanced approach focusing on compliance and price.

Thoroughly review 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for any implicit weighting or emphasis. Present a clear, concise bid that addresses all technical requirements and offers a competitive price. Assume price and technical compliance will be primary drivers.

The absence of detailed financial requirements means bidders must self-assess their financial standing and present a price that is both competitive and sustainable.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to determine a competitive yet profitable price. Ensure the bid demonstrates financial stability without needing to meet explicit thresholds, focusing on the ability to deliver.

The tender is for a 'used' minibus, which can introduce variability in vehicle condition and availability. Ensuring a specific vehicle meets all technical specs requires careful sourcing and inspection.

Maintain a robust network of reliable suppliers for used vehicles. Implement a rigorous pre-delivery inspection process to guarantee compliance with all technical specifications outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A reputable automotive dealer or specialized used vehicle supplier with a proven track record in supplying commercial vehicles, possessing a diverse inventory of used minibuses that can meet the specified technical requirements, and having a streamlined procurement and delivery process.
Key Requirements
Compliance with specific technical specifications for the used minibus (detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds
Legal registration to operate
Ability to deliver a used minibus
Submission of bids according to regulations in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' and inclusion of required submission forms
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to source and deliver a used minibus that precisely matches all technical specifications with minimal lead time.
A transparent and competitive pricing structure that clearly outlines value for money.
A proactive approach to communication and a commitment to prompt delivery within the specified timeframe.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on responsible sourcing of used vehicles or a commitment to efficient vehicle maintenance practices that minimize environmental impact during the vehicle's remaining lifespan.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Specification Compliance

Meticulously cross-reference every point in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' with the proposed minibus. Provide detailed documentation, including vehicle history, maintenance records, and any certifications, to prove compliance. Highlight any features that exceed minimum requirements.

Price Competitiveness

Conduct a thorough cost breakdown to ensure the price is attractive to the contracting authority while remaining profitable. Consider offering value-added services at no extra cost if possible, such as extended warranty or initial maintenance check.

Eligibility and Legal Compliance

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed and documented. Provide all necessary legal registration documents as required by 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'.

Recommendations5
Thorough Technical Specification Review and Matching
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to meticulously analyze 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'. Source and inspect potential used minibuses to ensure they meet or exceed every technical requirement. Document all specifications and provide supporting evidence (e.g., VIN, maintenance logs, photos).

Ensures bid is technically compliant and avoids disqualification.
Competitive Pricing Strategy
HighMed effort

Develop a pricing model that reflects the value of a used vehicle while remaining highly competitive. Conduct a detailed cost analysis, including sourcing, refurbishment (if any), delivery, and administrative costs, to arrive at an optimal price point.

Increases chances of winning if price is a significant, albeit unstated, factor.
Proactive Legal and Eligibility Verification
CriticalLow effort

Conduct an internal audit to confirm the absence of any mandatory exclusion grounds. Ensure all legal registration documents are up-to-date and readily available as per 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'.

Prevents immediate disqualification based on legal or regulatory non-compliance.
Adhere Strictly to Submission Requirements
HighMed effort

Carefully follow all instructions in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' regarding bid format, content, and submission method. Double-check all required forms are completed accurately and submitted before the deadline.

Avoids administrative disqualification and ensures a professional presentation.
Highlight Delivery Reliability and Speed
MediumMed effort

Emphasize the bidder's capability to deliver the used minibus within the 2-month timeframe, potentially even sooner if feasible. Showcase logistical strengths and a proven track record of timely deliveries.

Adds value beyond just the vehicle, appealing to the contracting authority's need for prompt service.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for acquiring a compliant used minibus, emphasizing the bidder's expertise in sourcing and delivering such vehicles efficiently. Highlight any unique advantages in vehicle inspection or preparation that ensure superior quality for a used vehicle.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted according to the regulations outlined in "Nolikums ar pielikumiem".
--Bids must include submission forms and adhere to evaluation criteria as per "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-13T11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be legally registered to operate.
--The bidder must be able to deliver a used minibus.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The used minibus must meet specific technical specifications (detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija").
--The bidder must demonstrate the capability to supply the specified used minibus.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168995_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260325121427.pdf -- 102.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the delivery of a used minibus, including submission forms and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
NOLIKUMS_mazlietots_mikroautobuss_parakst.doc -- 401.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement procedure to deliver a used minibus, including general information, submission requirements, and bidder qualifications.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender VAP 2026/8, which is for the delivery of a used minibus to the Vecumnieki association administration.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a used minibus is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks transparency in financial value and specific evaluation criteria. E-submission is a positive aspect, though some document access may be restricted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes are reported. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required item is clear, and the essential documents outlining requirements and submission forms are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. Objective criteria for technical capability are implied through detailed specifications. However, restricted document access and the undisclosed value could be perceived as less fair.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is set up for e-submission, which is practical. The contract duration is specified. However, financing information is not detailed, and the practicality is slightly reduced by potential document access restrictions.

Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. The tender status is active, and no disputes are noted, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability considerations.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of the required item
E-procurement enabled
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline