Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of construction design documentation and construction of outdoor canopies in preschool educational institutions "Čiekuriņš" in Kapsēde and "Ābolītis" in Durbe

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
169118
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of construction design documentation and construction of outdoor canopies in preschool educational institutions "Čiekuriņš" in Kapsēde and "Ābolītis" in Durbe

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169118_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260325144332.pdf -- 99.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for developing design documentation and constructing outdoor canopies at preschools in Dienvidkurzeme Municipality, specifically for the "Ābolītis" preschool in Durbe.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169118_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260325144332.pdf -- 99.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the development of design documentation and construction of outdoor canopies at preschools in Dienvidkurzeme Municipality.

NolikumsPDF
NOLIKUMS_Nojumes (1).pdf -- 424.2 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the development of design documentation and construction of outdoor canopies at preschools in Dienvidkurzeme municipality.

Projektēšanas uzdevumiPDF
Pielikums_Nr.2.1._Projektesanas_uzdevums_Abol... -- 344.8 KB

This document contains the design task for the development and construction of an outdoor canopy at the "Ābolītis" preschool in Durbe, specifying technical requirements and project objectives.

8.pielikums Līguma projektsDOC
Pielikums_Nr.8_Liguma_projekts.doc -- 236.0 KB

This document contains the draft contract for the development of design documentation and construction of an outdoor canopy at a preschool in Dienvidkurzeme Municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender (DKNP 2026/13) for the development of design documentation and construction of outdoor canopies in preschools, with a submission deadline of April 10, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for outdoor canopy construction documentation and construction is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria presents concerns regarding transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed financial value, which can impact legal compliance regarding transparency. No disputes are noted.

Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key documents like design tasks, contract draft, and technical specifications are provided, offering good insight into requirements. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts clarity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including organization, type, procedure, and deadlines. Six tender documents are available, covering design tasks, contract draft, and technical specifications. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements reduces completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No specific eligibility requirements provided
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement indicated, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria raise concerns about equal opportunity and transparency for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a clear submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag (implied by lack of explicit mention and potential restricted access) and the lack of explicit financing information reduce practicality.

No e-submission (implied)
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. Dates are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear tender title and description
Availability of key tender documents (design tasks, contract draft, technical specs)
Open procedure with reasonable deadlines
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline