Skip to main content
Tenders

Project Support Partner

Open
Deadline
62 days left
May 29, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021556-2026
Value
£3,600,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 22, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 29, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£3,600,000
Duration
48 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Sheffield Hallam University intends to appoint a single Project Support Partner (PSP) under a framework agreement to support the delivery of minor works, refurbishment and estate improvement projects across the University estate. The PSP will work collaboratively with the University's Estates & Facilities team and the appointed Campus Works Partner (CWP) to support the planning, development and delivery of projects delivered through the University's minor works programme. The PSP will provide a range of professional consultancy services required to support project delivery including, but not limited to: Programme and project management, Quantity surveying and cost management services, Principal Designer duties in accordance with the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations and relevant building safety legislation, NEC4 Supervisor duties, Building surveying services, Design services including architectural, structural and building services design (either directly or through sub-consultants). The PSP will support the development and delivery of projects across the estate including maintenance works, refurbishment projects and workplace change initiatives. Projects delivered through this framework are expected to range from low value maintenance works through to projects of up to approximately £3 million. The PSP will work closely with the University and the Campus Works Partner to coordinate project development, manage programme delivery, support NEC4 contract administration and ensure projects are delivered safely, efficiently and in accordance with statutory and regulatory requirements. The PSP may also be required to supplement the University's in-house Estates & Facilities resources, through secondments or task-specific commissions providing expertise in areas such as project management, cost management, health and safety, programme support and advisory services.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (10)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted in English.
--Bids must be submitted by the specified deadline.
--Bids must be comprehensive and address all aspects of the tender requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by relevant legislation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally established and registered to operate.
--Bidders must possess the necessary authorisations and licenses to provide the services required.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Proven experience in providing Programme and project management services.
--Proven experience in providing Quantity surveying and cost management services.
--Proven experience in fulfilling Principal Designer duties in accordance with CDM Regulations and relevant building safety legislation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial stability to undertake the contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear descriptions and requirements, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No explicit disputes or regulatory compliance issues are flagged within the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is comprehensive, detailing the scope of work, expected project types, and the collaborative nature of the role. AI-extracted requirements further clarify technical capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of content for the attached tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the requirements are described objectively, focusing on necessary capabilities rather than specific companies. Full document access is implied but not confirmed due to missing content. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is competitive.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents reduces practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no flags for suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a planning phase.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the assessment of sustainability integration.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of services
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
Open procedure with disclosed value
Logical timeline and contract details

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
No e-submission specified

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload complete tender documents with detailed content.
3. Incorporate sustainability objectives and criteria into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline