Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Projektstøttepartner

Åben
Frist
54 dage tilbage
Maj 29, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
021556-2026
Værdi
£3,600,000
Lokation
North East England, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 10, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Maj 22, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Maj 29, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

December 01, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£3,600,000
Varighed
48 måneder
Lokation
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Sheffield Hallam University har til hensigt at udpege en enkelt Projektstøttepartner (PSP) under en rammeaftale til at støtte leveringen af mindre arbejder, renoveringer og ejendomsforbedringsprojekter. PSP vil levere professionelle konsulentydelser, herunder program- og projektledelse, mængdeinspektion, Principal Designer-opgaver, NEC4 Supervisor-opgaver, bygningsinspektion og designydelser. Projekterne vil spænde fra vedligeholdelsesarbejder af lav værdi til cirka 3 millioner GBP.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

18 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (10)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted in English.
--Bids must be submitted by the specified deadline.
--Bids must be comprehensive and address all aspects of the tender requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by relevant legislation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally established and registered to operate.
--Bidders must possess the necessary authorisations and licenses to provide the services required.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Proven experience in providing Programme and project management services.
--Proven experience in providing Quantity surveying and cost management services.
--Proven experience in fulfilling Principal Designer duties in accordance with CDM Regulations and relevant building safety legislation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial stability to undertake the contract.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender is generally well-structured with clear descriptions and requirements, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No explicit disputes or regulatory compliance issues are flagged within the provided information.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required services is comprehensive, detailing the scope of work, expected project types, and the collaborative nature of the role. AI-extracted requirements further clarify technical capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of content for the attached tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open, and the requirements are described objectively, focusing on necessary capabilities rather than specific companies. Full document access is implied but not confirmed due to missing content. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is competitive.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents reduces practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no flags for suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a planning phase.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the assessment of sustainability integration.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear and detailed description of services
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
Open procedure with disclosed value
Logical timeline and contract details

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
No e-submission specified

Anbefalinger

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload complete tender documents with detailed content.
3. Incorporate sustainability objectives and criteria into the tender.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline