Business Durham Select List

This tender for a select list of business consultancy services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the deadline may be tight.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The mention of grant funding under UKSPF suggests adherence to specific funding regulations. The absence of disputes and a clear organization name contribute positively. The deadline, while active, could be considered short depending on the complexity of the required documentation.

The description of the service sought is clear, outlining the need for specialists to support businesses at various stages. The eligibility requirements are also reasonably defined. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves some ambiguity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of specified financial and submission requirements indicate a degree of incompleteness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility are objective. The process is described as 'Below threshold - open competition', suggesting a broad reach. The main concern is the lack of publicly available document content, which could hinder full access for all potential bidders.

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document URLs limit the practicality for bidders. The financing information is partially addressed by mentioning UKSPF grant funding.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are logically ordered.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it is EU funded (implied by UKSPF, though not explicitly stated as EU funded), the lack of specific sustainability criteria means this aspect is not well-addressed.