Skip to main content
Tenders

Replacement of the passenger elevator in the Social Welfare Home building in Krasnystaw (3.2026.)

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00166353/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Replacement of the passenger elevator in the Social Welfare Home building in Krasnystaw (3.2026.)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Dismantling of the existing drive unit.
--Dismantling of the existing elevator control equipment with the main switch and panel.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88c2-d95c-1ac9-056e-e50001aa98c5.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the replacement of a passenger elevator in the Social Welfare Home in Krasnystaw, Poland, requiring electronic submission of bids.

p_dps_krasnystaw_dźwig_v2 (2).pdfPDF
p_dps_krasnystaw_dźwig_v2 (2).pdf

No content extracted

Projekt winda DPS.pdfPDF
Projekt winda DPS.pdf

This document contains the technical design for the replacement of an elevator in the Social Welfare Home in Krasnystaw, detailing the existing and proposed elevator specifications, and the scope of renovation works.

Załącznik 3 -Umowa Dźwig.docDOC
Załącznik 3 -Umowa Dźwig.doc

This document contains the draft contract for the replacement of a passenger elevator in the Social Welfare Home in Krasnystaw, detailing contractor obligations, payment terms, and penalties.

Załącznik 4 - wykaz robót .docxDOC
Załącznik 4 - wykaz robót .docx

This document is a template for listing completed construction works, required for the tender concerning the replacement of a passenger elevator in the Social Welfare Home in Krasnystaw.

Załącznik 5 - wykaz osób .docxDOC
Załącznik 5 - wykaz osób .docx

This document is an annex requiring the bidder to list the personnel involved in the execution of the elevator replacement project at the Social Welfare Home in Krasnystaw.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for elevator replacement is generally well-structured with clear technical documentation and a reasonable set of required attachments. However, it lacks crucial financial details and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting overall transparency and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and location. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline is provided, but its reasonableness is questionable given the scope. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and technical specifications are available in the 'Projekt winda DPS.pdf'. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions for bidders.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by providing access to all necessary documents and utilizing e-procurement. The criteria are objective in terms of technical capability (dismantling tasks), but the lack of disclosed value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract start date is not provided, and financing information is absent. The deadline, while present, might be considered short for a project of this nature.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
E-procurement utilized
Required attachments clearly defined
CPV code and location specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Include information on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline