Skip to main content
Tenders

Delivery of an ultrasound machine

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00164746/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of an ultrasound machine

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8673-ce20-12d2-056e-e50001aa8cb5.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply of an ultrasound machine to the Independent Public Healthcare Center in Dęblin, Poland.

Załącznik nr 4 - Wzór umowy_ZP-SPZOZ.1.1.26.pdfPDF
Załącznik nr 4 - Wzór umowy_ZP-SPZOZ.1.1.26.p...

This document contains a draft contract for the supply of an ultrasound machine, detailing the subject of the contract, delivery terms, acceptance procedures, and remuneration.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an ultrasound machine is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria, along with a potentially short submission deadline, are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code and a clear procedure. However, the absence of a disclosed estimated value and the potentially short submission deadline could be seen as minor deviations from best practices for regulatory compliance and reasonable timelines.

Estimated value not disclosed
Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, description, and CPV code. The availability of multiple documents, including a draft contract and offer forms, contributes to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the organization, title, CPV, and deadline. A good number of documents are attached, offering details on the subject matter and contract terms. However, the estimated value and contract duration are missing, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of all tender documents and a draft contract allows for transparency. The criteria for exclusion and eligibility are listed, suggesting an objective approach. No specific company tailoring was identified.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction. The lack of a disclosed contract start date and financing information limits practical assessment.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'active' status is clear.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and CPV code
Comprehensive set of attached documents (8 total)
E-procurement characteristic noted
No identified tailored requirements for specific companies

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potentially short submission deadline
Missing contract duration and start date

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline if it is indeed too short.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline