Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

National Centre for Arts and Music Education

Open
Deadline
22 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
011236-2026
Value
£15,600,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£15,600,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Department for Education intends to procure a delivery partner to establish and operate a National Centre for Arts and Music Education. The Centre will aim to ensure every child in England has more equitable access to high-quality arts education by supporting excellent teaching, developing sustainable partnerships between schools and cultural organisations, and promoting arts education opportunities.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
011236-2026_ocds_record.json

The Department for Education seeks a delivery partner to establish and operate a National Centre for Arts and Music Education by September 2026, focusing on equitable access, high-quality teaching, partnerships, and overseeing Music Hubs for children aged 5-16 in England.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011236-2026_ocds_release.json

The Department for Education is seeking a delivery partner to establish and operate a National Centre for Arts and Music Education, aiming to provide equitable access to high-quality arts education for children aged 5-16, including overseeing Music Hubs and developing partnerships.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011236-2026_official.pdf

The Department for Education seeks a delivery partner to establish and operate a National Centre for Arts and Music Education, focusing on equitable access, high-quality teaching, and sustainable partnerships for children aged 5-16, including oversight of Music Hubs and fundraising.

Tender NoticeHTM
011236-2026.html

The Department for Education seeks a delivery partner to establish and operate a National Centre for Arts and Music Education, ensuring equitable access to high-quality arts education for 5-16 year olds in England by supporting teaching, developing partnerships, promoting arts education, and overseeing the Music Hubs network.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a significant initiative for arts and music education with a clear scope and substantial budget, but it currently lacks critical details regarding evaluation criteria and comprehensive bidder requirements, which could hinder fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the open procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria in the provided content represents a significant gap in legal compliance for a formal tender notice.

No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in AI-extracted requirements.
Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Clarity60/100

The description of the project's purpose, scope, and responsibilities is exceptionally clear and detailed. However, the clarity for potential bidders is severely compromised by the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and comprehensive bidder requirements, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
AI-extracted requirements are not comprehensive regarding bidder qualifications.
Completeness65/100

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and key dates are well-defined. The project's scope and service requirements are also detailed. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit bidder requirements (e.g., selection criteria) and, most critically, evaluation criteria.

Evaluation criteria are not defined.
Comprehensive bidder requirements (e.g., selection criteria) are not explicitly detailed.
Fairness60/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value, supporting e-procurement via Jaggaer, and explicitly encouraging participation from a wide range of organizations, including SMEs and consortia. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot objectively prepare their proposals or understand the basis of selection.

Evaluation criteria are not specified, impacting transparency and objectivity.
Practicality85/100

The tender supports electronic submission through an e-tendering portal, provides a clear contract start date and duration, and discloses financing information. The phased implementation plan is also clearly outlined, enhancing practicality for planning. The only minor point is the lack of a direct document URL, though access via the portal is implied.

Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates (submission, contract start, duration) are logical and consistent with the phased implementation plan. Minor inconsistencies include a missing code for the procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field, but these do not significantly impact overall data integrity.

Missing code for 'Open' procedure type.
Empty 'Liable Person' field.
Sustainability70/100

The tender demonstrates a strong commitment to social aspects, particularly ensuring equitable access for disadvantaged pupils and delivering a sustainable social impact program. It also encourages broad participation from diverse organizations. While green procurement is not explicitly highlighted, the social dimension is significant. Innovation is implied through the 'new online CPD offer' but not a central focus.

No explicit mention of green procurement principles.

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of the project's purpose and scope.
Significant estimated value and duration, indicating a substantial commitment.
Explicit encouragement for SMEs, VCSEs, and consortia, promoting broad participation.
Strong focus on social impact, equitable access, and sustainable partnerships.
Use of an e-tendering portal (Jaggaer) for submission.

Concerns

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria for bidder proposals.
Lack of comprehensive bidder requirements, including mandatory exclusion grounds.
The 'planned' status suggests some details are still pending, but as a tender notice, it's incomplete.
Missing code for the procedure type and empty 'Liable Person' field.
No explicit mention of green procurement or strong innovation focus.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive evaluation criteria and detailed bidder requirements as soon as possible to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide a clear document URL and ensure all tender documents are readily accessible through the e-tendering portal.
3. Consider incorporating explicit green procurement principles and innovation incentives into the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline