Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Dynamic Market (DM) for the provision of goods and services to drive economical, social and governance impact and improvement

Open
Deadline
3649 days left
March 31, 2036
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026586-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2036

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2036

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The White Horse Federation is establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for commonly used goods and services to drive social impact. Suppliers must indicate categories they are applying for to be invited to competitions. Customers will use categories to shortlist suppliers and invite them to further competition. Geographical location and additional capabilities (security clearance, value threshold, data security) will also be used for filtering.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for common goods and services with a focus on social impact. While generally well-structured, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows a dynamic market procedure, which is a recognized procurement method. The CPV code is provided, and the overall structure suggests regulatory compliance. The deadline is exceptionally long, which is unusual but not inherently non-compliant for a DPS. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for the further competitions is a notable omission.

Missing evaluation criteria for further competitions
Clarity80/100

The description clearly outlines the purpose of the DPS, the organization's mission, and the application process for suppliers. The use of categories, CPV codes, and NUTS codes aids in understanding the scope. The 'additional capabilities' section provides clarity on filters for further competitions.

Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and description is present. The submission deadline is specified, although it is exceptionally distant. The tender indicates that documents are available, but their content is not accessible or summarized, impacting completeness. Financial information is classified, and the estimated value is not disclosed.

No document content available
Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The DPS model inherently promotes fairness by allowing new suppliers to join. The use of objective criteria like CPV codes and NUTS codes, along with filters for further competitions, contributes to fairness. The long submission deadline also allows ample time for potential suppliers. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a dynamic market procedure, which typically implies e-submission. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests this might not be the case or is not clearly stated. The contract start date and financing information are missing, which hinders practical planning for potential suppliers.

No e-submission indicated
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a DPS, despite the very distant deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions driving 'economical, social and governance impact and improvement' and aims to 'drive social impact and improvement'. This indicates a focus on social aspects. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement or innovation, and it is not stated if EU funding is involved.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of innovation

Strengths

Clear DPS model for common goods and services
Focus on social impact and improvement
Use of CPV and NUTS codes for categorization
Long submission deadline for broad participation

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria for further competitions
Inaccessible or unsummarized tender documents
Missing financial details (estimated value, financing info)
Unclear e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria for further competitions within the DPS.
2. Make tender documents accessible or provide summaries to improve completeness and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide contract start date and financing information.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline