Reconstruction of district road No. 3430W on the section Kozłówka-Krzemień (Stage II)

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications, but lacks financial transparency and detailed evaluation criteria. It is active and uses e-procurement, but some practical aspects like contract duration and financing are missing.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code, having an active status, and specifying a deadline. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potential for a short deadline (depending on document availability) slightly lowers the score. No disputes are reported.

The technical requirements for the road reconstruction are detailed and specific, providing a good understanding of the expected work. The description of the road layers and dimensions is clear. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed beyond technical compliance.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a deadline. The CPV code and location are specified. However, crucial financial information (estimated value) is not disclosed, and details regarding contract duration and financing are missing, impacting overall completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The technical requirements are specific to the project and do not appear to be tailored to a single company. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency, but the objective criteria for technical capability are present. Deadlines are provided.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a contract start date, explicit financing information, and contract duration limits the practical assessment. The submission deadline is provided, but the overall practicality is hindered by missing contractual details.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported, indicating good data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.