Skip to main content
Tenders

Design and build installation of lighting at Daszyńskiego 81 Street in Gliwice

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00174050/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design and build installation of lighting at Daszyńskiego 81 Street in Gliwice

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Required warranty period: min. 36 months, max. 60 months, calculated from the date of final acceptance of the subject of the contract, with the warranty period being equal to the warranty period.
--Required warranty period: min. 36 months, max. 60 months, calculated from the date of final acceptance of the subject of the contract, with the warranty period being equal to the warranty period.
--The contractor's warranty and guarantee period for works and materials used for their execution and installed devices must be longer than the manufacturer's warranty period and the warranty period included in the functional-utility program.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b4c-3010-9865-5fad-950001e715f3.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the design and construction of lighting on Daszyńskiego Street 81 in Gliwice, Poland.

Program_funkcjonalno_uzytkowy.pdfPDF
Program_funkcjonalno_uzytkowy.pdf -- 1.1 MB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of street lighting is generally well-structured, with a clear description and a good number of supporting documents. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are provided, but their reasonableness is difficult to assess without knowing the complexity of the project. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the project's objective: 'Design and build' street lighting. The warranty and guarantee requirements are explicitly detailed. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed beyond basic compliance.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a description. Contract duration is specified. A significant number of documents are attached, covering various aspects of the project. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The requirements for warranty and guarantee periods are clearly stated and appear objective. There are no immediately obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied by the number of attachments.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. The contract duration is provided. However, information regarding financing and the specific contract start date is missing, which could hinder practical planning for potential bidders.

No contract start date specified
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, with a submission deadline and contract duration. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objective
Extensive documentation provided
E-Procurement enabled
Specific warranty/guarantee terms detailed

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated project value to provide better context for bidders.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency in the selection process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria to align with modern procurement standards.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline