Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Contract for the Management of the Provision of NHS Health Checks

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026999-2026
Value
£150,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Budget
£150,000
Duration
21 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Gateshead Council (the Council) is commissioning a Provider to manage the provision of NHS Health Checks within the Gateshead borough on its behalf. Contract dates: 1st July 2026 - 31st March 2028 Extension options: 2 periods of 12 months

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Providers must be capable of managing the provision of NHS Health Checks within the Gateshead borough on behalf of Gateshead Council.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for NHS Health Checks management is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the basic information is well-presented. However, the absence of specific technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as evaluation criteria, reduces overall clarity.

No specific technical capability requirements detailed
No specific financial requirements detailed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached document content prevents it from being fully complete.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed. The criteria for eligibility are broad, suggesting a fair approach. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract start date. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and financing information limits its practicality.

No e-submission (implied by 'E-Procurement' characteristic but not explicitly detailed)
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Open procedure with disclosed value
E-procurement characteristic
Logical timeline and contract duration

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
No explicit mention of sustainability or innovation aspects
Limited document content available

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation considerations.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline