Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation of the electrical installation in the IAS building at ul. Witosa 78B in Kielce

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00170880/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Świętokrzyskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Świętokrzyskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of the electrical installation in the IAS building at ul. Witosa 78B in Kielce

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for electrical installation renovation in Kielce is a price-driven opportunity. Bidders must focus on delivering the lowest possible price while demonstrating robust technical capability and adherence to all mandatory requirements to secure this contract.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Price for Quality Electrical Renovation

Reliable and Compliant Electrical Installation Services

Efficient Project Delivery within Budget

Key Opportunities
Sole evaluation criterion is price, allowing for direct competitive advantage through cost leadership.
Potential for a straightforward, low-complexity project if scope is well-defined and manageable.
Lack of specified duration and absence of Green/Social/Innovative aspects simplifies bid preparation, allowing focus on core price and technical compliance.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore bulk purchasing or supplier discounts. Consider lean project management techniques to minimize overheads.

Risk of underbidding leading to financial strain or quality compromise.

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that accounts for all potential risks and contingencies. Ensure realistic labor and material cost estimations. Factor in a reasonable profit margin.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all mandatory requirements to avoid disqualification.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents. Assign a dedicated compliance officer to verify adherence to all exclusion, eligibility, and submission criteria.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with a proven track record in electrical installation works, particularly in public sector buildings. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing and a strong understanding of local regulations and supply chains in the Kielce region.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds Compliance
Eligibility Requirements Compliance
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects on time and within budget, even with a highly competitive price.
A clear and concise technical proposal that assures the contracting authority of the bidder's competence and understanding of the scope, despite price being the sole evaluation factor.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider a voluntary commitment to employ local labor for a portion of the project, highlighting community benefit without significantly impacting cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Price100%

Aggressively price the bid to be the lowest, while ensuring profitability. Conduct detailed costings and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or compliance.

Technical CapabilityN/A (Pass/Fail or implicitly linked to price)

Ensure all technical requirements are met with clear, concise documentation. Highlight relevant past experience and certifications to build confidence, even though it's not directly scored.

Recommendations5
Aggressive Price Optimization
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a granular cost analysis to identify all possible cost-saving measures. Negotiate with suppliers for bulk discounts and explore efficient labor deployment. Aim to be the lowest bidder while maintaining a sustainable profit margin.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Meticulous Compliance Check
CriticalMed effort

Establish a rigorous internal checklist for all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements. Have a senior team member conduct a final review to prevent any grounds for disqualification.

Prevents immediate disqualification, ensuring the bid is considered.
Concise and Confident Technical Statement
MediumLow effort

Even though price is the sole evaluation criterion, a brief, clear statement of technical capability and understanding of the project scope can build trust and differentiate from potentially less organized competitors. Highlight relevant past projects and certifications.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute, subtly influencing the decision-maker.
Contingency Planning for Price Sensitivity
HighMed effort

Include a realistic contingency within the bid price to account for unforeseen issues or minor scope creep. This prevents the need for costly change orders later and reinforces reliability.

Protects profitability and enhances reputation for reliable delivery.
Early Engagement with Suppliers
HighMed effort

Begin discussions with key electrical material suppliers and subcontractors immediately to secure favorable pricing and availability, especially for materials needed for the renovation.

Enables more accurate and competitive pricing.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the essential quality and compliance required for public sector electrical installations. Emphasize reliability and adherence to standards, even at the lowest price point.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a5c-677c-bee7-056e-e50001aab57e.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the renovation of the electrical installation in the IAS building in Kielce, Poland, with the sole evaluation criterion being price.

20260325_Ogloszenie_o_zamowieniu.pdfPDF
20260325_Ogloszenie_o_zamowieniu.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the renovation of the electrical installation in the IAS building in Kielce, with offers to be submitted electronically and evaluated solely on price.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electrical installation renovation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria beyond price and details on contract duration and financing, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a proper CPV code and a clear procedure indicated as 'None' (likely meaning a standard open procedure). Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is not fully assessable without context. No disputes are reported. The procedure type is not explicitly stated beyond 'None', which could be clearer.

Clarity80/100

The description of the renovation work is clear. The CPV code is specific. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria beyond price makes the overall evaluation process less clear.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', indicating a modern and accessible submission method. The evaluation solely on price, while simple, can be perceived as objective. Full document access is implied by the availability of attachments. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a contract start date, contract duration, and specific financing information hinders practical planning for potential bidders.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is logical for the described work. No disputes or suspensions are reported, and the dates are consistent. The 'Procedure: None' is a minor point of potential ambiguity but doesn't create a logical inconsistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Specific CPV code provided
E-Procurement utilized
Documents are available and analyzed

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria limited to price
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria beyond price to ensure a more robust selection process.
2. Disclose the estimated value and provide details on contract duration and financing for better bidder planning.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement, social aspects) to align with modern procurement standards.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline