Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction supervision of land reclamation works

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168534
Value
€42,000
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
lowest price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€42,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Pieriga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction supervision of land reclamation works

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for melioration construction supervision in Mārupe municipality, with a low estimated value and a price-driven evaluation, presents a significant opportunity for experienced firms to secure a short-term contract. The primary focus must be on a highly competitive price, supported by a clear demonstration of technical capability and compliance with all mandatory requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective, compliant, and technically sound construction supervision for Mārupe municipality's melioration projects.

Key Opportunities
Low estimated value and price-driven evaluation create an opening for cost-competitive bidders.
Short contract duration (24 months) may deter larger firms, reducing competition.
Specific technical requirements for melioration supervision allow for targeted demonstration of expertise.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the lowest price evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to determine the absolute lowest viable price without compromising quality or compliance. Explore efficiencies in personnel deployment and overheads.

Ensuring all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously addressed and documented.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all exclusion grounds, cross-referencing with legal counsel if necessary. Proactively gather all required documentation well in advance of the deadline.

Potential for a high number of bidders due to the relatively straightforward nature of the service and location.

Focus on flawless submission and clear, concise articulation of technical capability to stand out even with a low price.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced construction supervision firm with a proven track record in civil engineering projects, particularly those involving land reclamation or similar infrastructure. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing, a team of qualified and certified specialists ready to be deployed, and a robust understanding of Latvian public procurement regulations.
Key Requirements
Demonstrate experience and provide information about specialists, including sworn statements if not directly employed.
Ability to fulfill responsibilities of a construction supervisor as detailed in the technical specification.
Adherence to public procurement regulations.
Submission of a technical and financial proposal.
Lowest price as the evaluation criterion.
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lowest competitive price that still allows for profitable execution.
A highly efficient and experienced team of specialists with specific melioration supervision experience.
A flawless bid submission with zero administrative errors.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment or sustainable construction practices if it can be achieved without increasing costs, as a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Price100% (implied)

Submit the lowest possible price that is still financially viable. This requires meticulous cost breakdown and identification of efficiencies.

Recommendations5
Price Optimization
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. Analyze all cost components to identify areas for efficiency and present the absolute lowest viable bid.

Directly determines the winning bid given the evaluation criteria.
Specialist Qualification & Documentation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all proposed specialists meet the technical requirements and that all necessary documentation (CVs, sworn statements if applicable) is complete and accurate. Highlight relevant melioration experience.

Failure to meet eligibility requirements will lead to disqualification.
Zero-Error Submission
CriticalMed effort

Implement a multi-stage review process for the entire bid submission to eliminate any administrative errors, omissions, or inconsistencies. This is crucial for a price-driven tender where technical aspects are less weighted.

Prevents disqualification on technicalities and ensures the bid is considered on its merits.
Exclusion Grounds Verification
HighMed effort

Conduct a thorough internal audit to confirm the bidder meets all mandatory exclusion grounds. Proactively gather supporting evidence for each.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Technical Specification Alignment
MediumMed effort

Clearly map the proposed team's experience and proposed methodology to the specific requirements outlined in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija' to demonstrate capability, even if price is the primary driver.

Reinforces credibility and shows understanding of the project.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective and compliant provider of essential melioration construction supervision services, emphasizing efficiency and reliability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a technical and financial proposal.
--The evaluation criteria are based on the lowest price.
--The tender requires adherence to the regulations for public procurement procedures.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as defined in the procurement regulations.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm their experience and provide information about specialists.
--Specialists must provide a sworn statement if not directly employed by the bidder.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The technical specification outlines the scope of work for construction supervision services.
--Requirements for personnel and planning are detailed in the technical specification.
--Bidders must demonstrate their ability to fulfill the responsibilities of a construction supervisor.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168534_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319141222.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for construction supervision of melioration works in Mārupe municipality, including exclusion conditions, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria based on the lowest price.

Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
2_pielik_Tehnspecifikācijas Zeltiņu ielai 1.k... -- 60.7 KB

This document contains the technical specification for construction supervision services for the reconstruction of Zeltiņu Street, outlining the scope of work, requirements for personnel and planning, and the responsibilities of the construction supervisor.

Apliecinājums par pieredzi un speciālistiemDOC
3_pielikums_Apliecinajums_par_pieredzi_MNP_20... -- 25.8 KB

This document contains a confirmation of experience and information about specialists, requiring bidders to detail their relevant project experience and provide information on key personnel, including a sworn statement from specialists not directly employed by the bidder.

NolikumsDOC
NOTEIKUMI_MNP_2026_28.docx -- 72.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement procedure concerning construction supervision for melioration works, identifying the contracting authority, requirements for bidders, and the evaluation process.

Vispārīgās vienošanās projektsDOC
Vispariga_vienosanas_ligums_MNP_2026_28.docx -- 50.9 KB

This document is a draft general agreement for construction supervision of land reclamation works, outlining the process for selecting participants and awarding contracts based on tender results.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning construction supervision for land reclamation works, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction supervision of land reclamation works is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria beyond the lowest price and has some concerns regarding document access and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement regulations, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. The procedure is open, allowing broad participation.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the technical specification provides detailed requirements for personnel and planning. The regulations and requirements are documented in separate forms, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the technical specification, regulations, and contract draft are provided. However, financial requirements for bidders are not specified.

Financial requirements for bidders not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, focusing on the lowest price. However, the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, which could impact fairness if not resolved.

Restricted document access flagged.
Practicality65/100

E-procurement is indicated, which is positive. The contract duration is specified. However, the tender documents do not explicitly state the contract start date or provide details on financing, which are important practical aspects.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these sustainability dimensions.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specification and requirements.
Open procedure with e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.
CPV code and NUTS code provided.

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond lowest price.
Potential restricted document access.
Lack of specified financial requirements for bidders.
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria beyond the lowest price.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline