Measured Term Contract 2026

This tender is well-structured with clear scope and eligibility criteria, but lacks specific evaluation details and financial transparency. The deadline appears reasonable for a planning stage notice.

The tender provides a clear CPV code and organizational details. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline is relatively short for a planning notice. The absence of explicit mention of disputes or regulatory compliance issues is positive. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission.

The description of the works framework is clear, outlining the types of projects and the portfolio's diversity. Eligibility requirements are well-defined, specifying the scope of works. However, specific technical capability and submission requirements are not detailed, leaving some ambiguity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is present. Contract duration and start dates are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed and classified, and no tender documents with content are available, impacting overall completeness.

The tender aims for a multi-lot framework, suggesting potential for broad participation. Eligibility criteria are based on project scope rather than specific company attributes. The value is classified, which is a concern for transparency. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair.

The contract start date is well in the future, allowing ample planning time. Financing information is not provided. The absence of explicit mention of e-submission and document URLs limits practical assessment, though it's a planning stage notice.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start date is significantly after the submission deadline, which is consistent for a planning notice.

The description mentions 'Responsible Procurement principles, including environmental sustainability, carbon reduction and ethical supply chain management,' which is a positive indicator. However, specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are not detailed, limiting the score.