Skip to main content
Tenders

MW2315 - Beulah Hill Cladding Remediation - Consultant project Management Services Tender

Open
Deadline
34 days left
May 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021001-2026
Value
£917,500
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 07, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£917,500
Duration
36 months
Location
London
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Employers Agent services to the end of making good defects period. Architect to design the works and review and provide technical advice to Hastoe Housing Association to completion of the contractor’s remediation works. Hastoe is seeking the instruction to provide the following services for the cladding remediation of 2 adjacent buildings in Beulah Hill, Upper Norwood, London SE19 3DT. The two buildings affected are 1-73 Menlo Gardens and 26-78 Priory Crescent. Fire Consultant/Engineer Services. Structural Engineer Services. Site Inspections to the end of making good defects period. Cost Consultancy to the end of making good defects period. CDM Principal Designer & Building Regulations Principal Designer to completion of remediation works. BSF Interface as the Grant Certificate Officer and monthly liaison. Includes, fire and rescue authority support – liaising on behalf of the Client with the London Fire Brigade or similar authority if they require information or support to Hastoe Housing Association on the project. Social Value – provision for support with the Client. For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-Kingston-upon-Thames:-Advisory-architectural-services./A5QUX7VMZG. To respond to this opportunity, please click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/A5QUX7VMZG

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (10)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must respond to this opportunity via the Delta eSourcing portal.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-05-01T00:00:00.
--Further information can be found on the Delta eSourcing portal.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Bidders must be able to provide Employer's Agent services to the end of the making good defects period.
--Bidders must be able to provide Architect services to design the works and review and provide technical advice to Hastoe Housing Association to completion of the contractor’s remediation works.
--Bidders must be able to provide Fire Consultant/Engineer Services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The services required are advisory architectural services, including design, technical advice, and project management for cladding remediation.
--Specific technical expertise is required in fire engineering, structural engineering, cost consultancy, and CDM regulations.
--Experience in managing remediation works for housing associations is likely expected.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 917500.0 EUR.
--The duration of the contract is 36 months.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for consultancy project management services for cladding remediation is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity of the services. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of services required is detailed and specific, outlining the various consultancy roles needed. The eligibility requirements are clearly listed. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could lead to some ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, which impacts completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open, promoting fairness. The requirements are detailed and appear objective, focusing on the necessary expertise for the project. Access to the full documentation via a portal is standard.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-submission via a portal and provides URLs for information and response. The contract start date and duration are clear. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the reliance on an external portal for full document access might be a minor inconvenience.

No e-submission (implied, as it directs to a portal)
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent within the tender information.

Sustainability50/100

While 'Social Value' is mentioned as a requirement for support, there is no explicit focus on green procurement, innovation, or confirmation of EU funding, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No innovation focus

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of required services
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure and objective eligibility criteria
Active status and reference number provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Potential for a tight submission deadline
Limited explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria to enhance bidder understanding.
2. Ensure tender documents are accessible or summarized to improve completeness.
3. Consider detailing specific green or innovation aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline