Skip to main content
Tenders

TRGBS 263 Disclosure Barring Services Tender

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024850-2026
Value
£350,000
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
£350,000
Duration
37 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Riverside Group is looking for a supplier to tender for the provision of Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checking service. These services will support TRG’s recruitment and safeguarding requirements by ensuring all relevant staff, volunteers and contractors undergo appropriate DBS checks in accordance with UK legislation.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Disclosure and Barring Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the service type (DBS checks).

Clarity80/100

The description of the required service (DBS checks) is clear and its purpose is well-defined. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements significantly reduces overall clarity regarding what is expected from bidders.

No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, or submission.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, the critical omission of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria means the tender is not fully complete for bidders to prepare a comprehensive response.

Missing detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is reasonable for an open tender. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of detailed requirements could be seen as a broad invitation to tender.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for accessing tender documents (beyond the count of 5) hinders practical engagement for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified.
No URL for tender documents provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration.
Open procedure and CPV code provided.
Basic service description is clear.

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Missing evaluation criteria.
No e-submission specified.
No URL for tender documents.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria clearly.
3. Indicate the method for e-submission and provide direct links to tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline