Skip to main content
Tenders

Bicycle parking facilities in multi-apartment building areas

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168976
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,726
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
2,311 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Bicycle parking facilities in multi-apartment building areas
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--[Submission requirements outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--Submission deadline: 2026-04-13T09:00:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Exclusion conditions outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Eligibility criteria outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Technical requirements for bicycle parking facilities as per 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Detailed technical specifications and material requirements for bicycle boxes including structural elements, dimensions, and finishing details as per 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Financial proposal requirements outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168976_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260325145339.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for bicycle parking facilities in multi-apartment building areas, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical and financial proposal requirements.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemPDF
1_Slēdzamas velo kastes principiāla detalizāc... -- 130.1 KB

This document contains detailed technical specifications and material requirements for the construction of bicycle boxes, including structural elements, dimensions, and finishing details.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning the supply of bicycle parking facilities in multi-apartment building areas, with a submission deadline of April 13, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bicycle parking facilities is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications, but lacks transparency in financial value and evaluation criteria, and has restricted document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and potential for restricted document access could raise concerns.

Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title and description of the subject matter. Technical requirements are detailed in attached documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and deadlines. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and has objective criteria outlined in the documents. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential lack of full document access for all potential bidders, which impacts fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit information regarding financing and the contract start date (beyond duration) could be improved for practical planning by bidders.

No e-submission (implied by restricted access/lack of explicit platform mention)
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded' but lacks specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided in documents
E-Procurement utilized
Reasonable submission deadline
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Evaluation criteria not explicitly specified
Lack of specific sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
3. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline