Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of social services

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00175978/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Dolnośląskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Dolnośląskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€427,177
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
56%
4,229 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Provision of social services

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for social services presents a moderate competition opportunity due to the lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria. A winning strategy will focus on proactive engagement with the contracting authority to clarify ambiguities, demonstrate robust operational capability, and highlight any inherent strengths, even without explicit social value or innovation requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Compliant Service Delivery

Proactive Partnership and Responsiveness

Cost-Effective and Efficient Operations

Key Opportunities
Clarification of Ambiguous Requirements
Leveraging Existing Infrastructure and Expertise
Short Contract Duration (6 months)
Key Challenges
Lack of Defined Evaluation Criteria

Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority regarding how bids will be evaluated. If no clarification is provided, assume a balanced approach focusing on compliance, technical capability, and price. Prepare a comprehensive bid that addresses all potential evaluation factors, even if not explicitly stated, and clearly articulate value.

Absence of Specific Technical and Financial Requirements

Develop a robust proposal that clearly outlines the bidder's technical capabilities, operational plan, and financial stability, exceeding minimum expectations. Provide detailed evidence of past performance and relevant certifications to demonstrate competence and reliability, thereby filling the information gap.

Potential for High Competition due to Simplicity

Focus on demonstrating exceptional operational efficiency, a clear understanding of the target demographic's needs (even if not specified), and a commitment to high-quality service delivery. Highlight any unique strengths or efficiencies that can be achieved within the 6-month timeframe.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced provider of social care or residential services with a strong track record in Poland, particularly in the NUTS:PL515 region. The ideal bidder will have a flexible operational model, a clear understanding of Polish social care regulations, and the capacity to quickly adapt to potentially undefined service delivery expectations. They should also be adept at navigating procurement processes with limited information.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to rapidly deploy services and adapt to evolving needs within a short contract period.
Clear articulation of operational excellence and quality assurance processes that ensure reliable service delivery.
Proactive and transparent communication strategy with the contracting authority throughout the bidding process and potential contract execution.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is indicated, a winning bidder can still propose commitments that align with the general spirit of social services, such as prioritizing local employment opportunities for individuals facing barriers to employment or implementing volunteer engagement programs within the service delivery framework. This can be framed as enhancing community integration and support.
Bid Focus Areas
Compliance with Mandatory Requirements

Ensure absolute adherence to all stated and implied mandatory requirements. Given the lack of detail, this means meticulously addressing all sections of the tender response and proactively identifying and fulfilling any implicit obligations related to social services provision.

Technical Capability Demonstration

Provide comprehensive evidence of existing technical capabilities, including staff qualifications, operational procedures, facility standards (if applicable), and experience in similar residential care settings. Use case studies and testimonials to support claims.

Price Competitiveness

Develop a cost-effective proposal that reflects efficient operations and value for money. While not explicitly stated as a criterion, price is almost always a significant factor in public procurement. Ensure the pricing is competitive but sustainable.

Recommendations6
Submit Formal Clarification Requests
CriticalMed effort

Proactively submit formal clarification requests to the Contracting Authority (Powiatowe Centrum Pomocy Rodzinie w Jeleniej Górze) regarding the absence of specific exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria. This is crucial for understanding the authority's expectations and tailoring the bid effectively.

Significantly increases the ability to meet unstated requirements and differentiate the bid.
Assume Balanced Evaluation and Prepare Accordingly
CriticalHigh effort

In the absence of defined evaluation criteria, assume a balanced evaluation approach that considers compliance, technical capability, and price. Prepare a bid that excels in all these areas, providing robust evidence for each.

Ensures the bid is competitive across all likely evaluation dimensions.
Highlight Operational Agility and Rapid Deployment
HighMed effort

Emphasize the bidder's ability to quickly mobilize resources and commence service delivery within the 6-month contract duration. Showcase successful past projects with short lead times or flexible operational models.

Addresses the short contract duration and positions the bidder as a reliable and efficient partner.
Develop a Comprehensive Service Delivery Plan
HighHigh effort

Even without specific technical requirements, create a detailed service delivery plan that outlines staffing, operational procedures, quality assurance, and risk management for providing residential social services. This demonstrates foresight and capability.

Fills the technical requirement gap and builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver.
Propose Value-Added Community Integration Initiatives
MediumMed effort

Despite 'Social Aspects: No', propose initiatives that enhance community integration for service users, such as partnerships with local organizations for activities or skill-building workshops. Frame these as enhancing the overall well-being and outcomes for service recipients.

Adds a layer of social responsibility and potential positive impact beyond the minimum requirements.
Thoroughly Review Polish Procurement Law
HighHigh effort

Ensure a deep understanding of Polish Public Procurement Law (Prawo zamówień publicznych) and any specific regulations pertaining to social services in Poland, especially concerning exclusion grounds and eligibility, even if not explicitly detailed in the tender notice.

Prevents disqualification due to non-compliance with overarching legal frameworks.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bidder as the most reliable and experienced provider capable of immediate and seamless service commencement, leveraging existing infrastructure and proven operational excellence. Emphasize a proactive communication approach to mitigate the risks associated with the tender's ambiguity, demonstrating a partnership mentality rather than a transactional one.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information on specific exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8d94-cdc5-9501-5fad-950001e723c5.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for social services issued by the County Family Support Center in Jelenia Góra, Poland.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for social services is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and specific requirements, impacting completeness and clarity. The e-procurement characteristic is a positive aspect.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an active status. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the potentially short submission deadline raise minor concerns regarding procedural clarity and fairness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, reference, and CPV code. However, the lack of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects makes the overall clarity of what is expected from bidders moderate.

No information on specific exclusion grounds.
No information on specific eligibility requirements.
Completeness70/100

While basic information like title, organization, and deadline are present, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing. The contract duration is specified.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No information on specific exclusion grounds.
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. However, the lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria could potentially hinder a fully objective assessment and fair competition. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a contract start date and the lack of detailed financial information or financing sources limit its practicality. The short submission deadline also poses a challenge.

Submission Deadline: 2026-04-07 06:00:00 (potentially too short)
Value not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

E-Procurement characteristic
Clear CPV code and title
Documents available for download
Active status and reference number provided

Concerns

Missing crucial requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline