Skip to main content
Tenders

Managed Print and printer services

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022813-2026
Value
£3,600,000
Location
Yorkshire and the Humber, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
£3,600,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Yorkshire and the Humber
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Requirement for a managed print service for the organisation including supply and management of multi-functional devices (MFD), printers and plotters for office use. These are at selected sites throughout the Yorkshire water region.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Deadline: 2026-04-13T12:00:00+01:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Supply and management of multi-functional devices (MFD), printers and plotters for office use.
--Services to be provided at selected sites throughout the Yorkshire water region.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 3600000 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for managed print services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission methods, impacting practicality and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract value and duration. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the managed print service requirement is clear, outlining the need for MFDs, printers, and plotters across various sites. Technical capability requirements are broadly stated but lack specific detail.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements means essential documentation is not fully available.

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective in principle, but the lack of specified evaluation criteria prevents a full assessment of fairness. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content significantly hinder practical application. While a contract start date is provided, the overall submission process is not clearly defined.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and basic description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Appropriate CPV code

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed submission requirements
No document content available
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide clear instructions and links for e-submission and access to full tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and social value elements into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline