Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Tier 2 Weight Management programme

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020349-2026
Value
£1,200,000
Location
Outer London - West and North West, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,200,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Outer London - West and North West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The London Borough of Ealing is seeking a suitably qualified provider to deliver a Tier 2 Weight Management Programme for adults (18+) and young people (aged 14–17) in the borough. Delivery should be tailored to local population needs, and designed to complement existing services and primary care pathways and demonstrate strong community links, robust safeguarding, and capacity to deliver culturally tailored interventions. This Procurement is being carried out under the Provider Selection Regime (PSR).

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Provider must be suitably qualified.
--Must deliver a Tier 2 Weight Management Programme for adults (18+) and young people (aged 14–17).
--Delivery should be tailored to local population needs.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Tier 2 Weight Management Programme is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract start date. No disputes are noted. The use of the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) is mentioned, which is a regulatory framework.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required service is clear, outlining the target audience and key delivery aspects such as tailoring to local needs, community links, and cultural sensitivity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, organization, and estimated value is present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of detailed submission requirements reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on service delivery capabilities. The link provided for more information suggests a commitment to transparency, though specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Practicality65/100

The tender provides a URL for further information, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of detailed submission requirements make the practicalities of the submission process less clear.

No e-submission specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements of sustainability considerations in public tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and objectives
Reasonable estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure with CPV code provided
Link to additional information available

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific submission requirements detailed
Lack of content in provided tender documents
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
2. Provide detailed submission instructions and ensure tender documents are accessible.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline