Saturday Day Services

This tender for Saturday Day Services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document access, impacting its overall quality.

The tender adheres to below-threshold contract rules under the Procurement Act 2023, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the absence of a reveal date for tender documents, which is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the service is clear, outlining the target group and the essential components of the support to be provided. Requirements are documented, although specific evaluation criteria are missing, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for extension are objective (satisfactory performance outcomes). However, the lack of readily available tender document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less than fully transparent.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, and financing is implied by the estimated value. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL for documents hinders practical access for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the timeline is consistent. The AI-extracted deadline of 2026-04-21T00:00:00 differs slightly from the stated '2026-04-21 11:00:00', but this is a minor discrepancy.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.