Skip to main content
Tenders

Online payment solution for VN Exams

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020252-2026
Value
£455,000
Location
Inner London - East, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£455,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - East
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Online payment solution for British Council VN Exams

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an online payment solution is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, specifying the organization, and including a CPV code. The procedure type is mentioned, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern depending on specific national regulations.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the purpose of the tender. The estimated value and contract duration are provided. However, the lack of available document content and specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders a comprehensive understanding of the requirements and how proposals will be assessed.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are also specified. However, the critical absence of any document content or summaries, and the lack of specified evaluation criteria, leaves significant gaps in the provided information.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The procedure is described as competitive. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of a competitive flexible procedure suggests a degree of fairness in the selection process.

Practicality65/100

While a submission deadline and contract start date are provided, the tender lacks information on e-submission, which is a significant drawback for modern procurement. The absence of document URLs and financing information further reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document URL
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically ordered. The CPV code is also present and relevant.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common elements in modern sustainability considerations for public tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Reference number and organization specified
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission specified
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with clear content and summaries.
2. Specify detailed evaluation criteria for proposals.
3. Incorporate e-submission functionality and clarify financing details.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline