Schools Property Flood Resilience: Regional Providers (Design and Build)

This tender for Schools Property Flood Resilience (Design and Build) is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a substantial estimated value. Key areas for improvement include the availability of detailed evaluation criteria and the provision of document content.

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate. While deadlines are present, the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity and value. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the project's aims and scope is clear, outlining the need for property flood resilience solutions. Requirements for supplier capabilities are documented. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, hindering a full assessment of completeness. The submission deadline is provided.

The tender is open to all eligible bidders, and the division into regional lots promotes wider participation. The price-per-quality-point methodology is a standard evaluation approach. The restriction of a maximum of three lots per bidder is a reasonable measure to ensure broader distribution of contracts. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

The tender specifies an open procedure, but the lack of explicit mention of e-submission is a concern. The contract start date and duration are provided. Financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value. The division into lots enhances practicality for regional suppliers.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced.

The tender mentions 'green (nature-based) categories' for flood resilience, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of broader green procurement policies, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding.