Skip to main content
Tenders

Granting of licenses for screening of shows and delivery of digital versions of shows for projection in the main projection hall of the Planetarium - Silesian Science Park.

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00163070/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€272,436
Avg. Bids
0.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
47%
1,187 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Granting of licenses for screening of shows and delivery of digital versions of shows for projection in the main projection hall of the Planetarium - Silesian Science Park.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the given data.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided in the given data.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the given data.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the given data.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the given data.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85b8-0b4c-4903-056e-e500011b876c.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the licensing and digital delivery of shows for the Planetarium - Science Park in Chorzów, Poland.

PLS-DJ.253.2.2026_SWZ_seanse.pdfPDF
PLS-DJ.253.2.2026_SWZ_seanse.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Order Conditions (SWZ) for a public procurement procedure concerning the licensing and digital delivery of show content for the main projection hall of the Planetarium - Science Park.

PLS-DJ.253.2.2026_zalacznik_1_oferta_seanse.docxDOC
PLS-DJ.253.2.2026_zalacznik_1_oferta_seanse.d...

This document is a tender offer form requiring bidders to provide company details, pricing for specific film screenings, and declarations regarding contract terms and subcontracting.

PLS-DJ.253.2.2026_zalacznik_2_OPZ_seanse.pdfPDF
PLS-DJ.253.2.2026_zalacznik_2_OPZ_seanse.pdf

This document details the technical specifications for the delivery of a license and digital version of a show for the Planetarium - Śląski Park Nauki, including specific requirements for resolution, duration, and compatibility with their projection system.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for film licensing and digital delivery is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, CPV code, and a clear submission deadline. The procedure is noted as 'None', which is unusual and could indicate a simplified process or a lack of detailed procedural information. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the presence of standard documents like SWZ and offer forms.

Clarity80/100

The description of the subject matter is clear, outlining the need for licensing and digital delivery of show content. Key documents like technical specifications and offer forms are provided, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and deadline. Several essential documents are attached, such as technical specifications and offer templates. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with e-procurement characteristics and a clear set of attached documents. The absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria prevents a full assessment of fairness, but there are no overt signs of tailored requirements for specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a defined submission deadline. However, the lack of explicit information on e-submission (beyond 'E-Procurement' characteristic) and the absence of contract start date and financing details make it less practical for bidders to fully plan their submission and execution.

No e-submission details provided
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The CPV code is correctly specified.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the subject matter
Comprehensive set of attached documents
Defined CPV code and location
Active status with a clear deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations
Missing contract duration and start date

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline