Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of a multifunctional hall in Gamów, Stage III, including site development

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00167788/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of a multifunctional hall in Gamów, Stage III, including site development
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a multifunctional hall in Gamowo, Stage III, presents a solid opportunity for experienced construction firms. While lacking explicit evaluation criteria, a focus on meticulous technical compliance, competitive pricing, and proactive engagement with the contracting authority will be crucial for success. Leveraging past project experience and demonstrating a clear understanding of the project's context within the LEADER program will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable Delivery of Community Infrastructure: Emphasize a proven ability to construct high-quality, functional public spaces that meet community needs, aligning with the project's 'impuls dla społeczności' (impulse for the community) objective.

Cost-Effective and Compliant Execution: Highlight a commitment to delivering the project within budget and strictly adhering to all technical specifications and legal requirements, ensuring value for the Contracting Authority.

Understanding of Project Context: Demonstrate an appreciation for the project's integration within the LEADER program and its role in improving public infrastructure, showcasing alignment with the Contracting Authority's strategic goals.

Key Opportunities
Lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria presents an opportunity for bidders to define their value proposition through a well-structured and comprehensive offer.
The project is part of a strategic plan for the Common Agricultural Policy (LEADER program), suggesting the Contracting Authority values projects that contribute to local development and community improvement.
The tender specifies multiple detailed attachments (project documentation, bill of quantities, technical specifications) which, if meticulously addressed, can form the basis of a strong technical proposal.
Key Challenges
Absence of defined evaluation criteria makes it difficult to prioritize bid elements and understand the weighting of different aspects.

Assume a balanced approach, prioritizing technical compliance, competitive pricing, and a clear demonstration of capability. Proactively seek clarification from the Contracting Authority if possible, or infer likely criteria based on similar public tenders.

The tender explicitly states 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: No' and 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No', which removes common areas for differentiation and potential scoring advantages.

Focus on excelling in the core technical and commercial aspects. While not explicitly required, subtly highlighting efficient resource use or community benefits in the narrative can still add value without overstepping requirements.

The estimated value is not disclosed, making it harder to gauge the expected price range and competitive landscape.

Conduct thorough market research on similar projects in the region. Prepare a detailed cost breakdown based on the bill of quantities and technical specifications, ensuring competitiveness while maintaining profitability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with a proven track record in delivering public infrastructure projects, particularly multifunctional halls or similar community facilities. The ideal bidder will possess strong project management capabilities, a robust understanding of Polish public procurement law, and the capacity to manage complex construction phases. Experience with projects co-financed by EU funds or similar strategic programs would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Adherence to all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements (details not provided, but assumed to be standard).
Detailed description of the subject of the order (Attachment no. 4), including specific project documentation for Stage III (Attachments 4.1, 4.2, 4c), Bill of Quantities (Attachment 4a), and Technical Specification (Attachment 4b).
Submission of a compliant offer using the provided Formularz oferty (Attachment no. 1) and relevant declarations (Attachments no. 2, 3, 6, 7).
Understanding and acceptance of the Draft Contract Provisions (Attachment no. 5).
Demonstration of technical capability through a Wykaz robót (Attachment no. 8) and Wykaz osób (Attachment no. 9).
Key Discriminators
Exceptional clarity and detail in the technical proposal, directly addressing every aspect of the provided project documentation and technical specifications.
A highly competitive and well-justified price, demonstrating efficient cost management and value for money.
A strong narrative that connects the project to the broader goals of local development and community enhancement, even if social value isn't a formal criterion.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a formal requirement, consider including a statement in the offer's narrative about commitment to local employment where feasible, or responsible waste management practices during construction, framed as good operational practice rather than a formal social value commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Compliance (Implicit)

Meticulously review and address all technical specifications (Attachment 4b) and project documentation (Attachments 4.1, 4.2, 4c). Ensure the proposed construction methodology, materials, and quality control processes align perfectly with the tender requirements. Highlight any specific expertise related to thermal modernization as mentioned in Attachment 4.2.

Pricing (Implicit)

Develop a detailed and accurate Bill of Quantities (Attachment 4a) based pricing. Benchmark against similar projects and ensure the price is competitive yet profitable. Clearly articulate the value proposition associated with the price.

Capability and Experience (Implicit)

Thoroughly complete the Wykaz robót (Attachment no. 8) and Wykaz osób (Attachment no. 9). Select projects and personnel that best demonstrate experience in similar scale and type of construction, particularly public infrastructure and community facilities. Emphasize any experience with projects co-financed by EU funds or similar strategic programs.

Offer Completeness and Compliance (Implicit)

Ensure all required forms, declarations, and attachments are completed accurately and submitted on time. Pay close attention to the Draft Contract Provisions (Attachment no. 5) and ensure the offer implicitly or explicitly addresses any potential concerns.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze Project Documentation
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant time to understanding Attachments 4.1, 4.2, and 4c. Identify any potential ambiguities or areas for clarification regarding the project's scope, especially concerning the thermal modernization aspect mentioned in Attachment 4.2.

Ensures a technically sound and compliant bid, minimizing risks of rejection or future disputes.
Infer and Address Likely Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Given the absence of explicit criteria, assume that technical quality, price, and bidder experience will be key. Structure the bid to excel in these areas, providing clear evidence of capability and a competitive price.

Maximizes the chances of a favorable evaluation, even without defined weights.
Highlight Project Alignment with LEADER Program Goals
HighLow effort

In the bid narrative (e.g., in the offer form or a cover letter), subtly connect the proposed construction to the project's stated purpose within the LEADER program: 'Poprawa małej infrastruktury publicznej w Gamowie' and 'impuls dla społeczności'.

Demonstrates understanding of the Contracting Authority's strategic objectives and adds qualitative value.
Proactive Clarification Requests
HighMed effort

If any aspect of the tender documents is unclear or seems contradictory, submit formal clarification requests to the Contracting Authority through the official procurement platform. This demonstrates diligence and ensures a compliant bid.

Prevents potential misunderstandings, reduces the risk of non-compliance, and shows proactive engagement.
Detailed Costing Based on Bill of Quantities
HighHigh effort

Develop a granular cost breakdown directly tied to Attachment 4a (Bill of Quantities). Ensure all line items are accounted for and that the pricing reflects efficient resource allocation and current market rates.

Leads to a competitive and justifiable price, a key factor in winning public tenders.
Comprehensive Personnel and Works Experience
MediumMed effort

Carefully select and detail the most relevant projects for Attachment no. 8 (Wykaz robót) and the most qualified personnel for Attachment no. 9 (Wykaz osób). Tailor these to showcase experience directly applicable to building multifunctional halls and site development.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project successfully.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically sound and compliant offer, demonstrating a deep understanding of the project's specifics and the provided documentation. Emphasize a meticulous approach to execution.
Present a price that is demonstrably competitive while reflecting the quality and reliability of the proposed solution. Avoid being the cheapest if it compromises perceived quality; aim for the best value.
Leverage any past experience with similar public sector projects or projects co-financed by EU funds to highlight credibility and a proven ability to navigate public procurement processes and standards.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Description of the subject of the order - attachment no. 4
--Attachment 4.1 to OPZ - Stage I of works - changes_unimportant_project_OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST STAGE
--Attachment 4.2 to OPZ Project documentation - contains the 2020 project and the project of changes to the project (current regarding the thermal modernization)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de893c-8e54-980f-056e-e50001aaa0b3.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the construction of a multifunctional hall in Gamowo, Stage III, including site development, issued by the Municipality of Rudnik.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a multifunctional hall in Gamowo, Stage III, is generally well-structured with clear documentation and EU funding. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code, location information, and indicating EU funding. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is not assessed without further context. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the subject of the order is clear, and key documents like the bill of quantities and technical specifications are referenced as attachments. The project documentation is stated to be current for thermal modernization. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which hinders a complete understanding of how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions. Several essential documents are attached or referenced.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with full document access indicated and the use of e-procurement. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, but there are no obvious signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency.

Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information, along with the undisclosed estimated value, reduces its practicality for potential bidders. The deadline is also noted as potentially short.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The CPV code and NUTS code are present.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the subject of the order
EU Funded and E-Procurement characteristics
Comprehensive set of attached documents
Presence of CPV and NUTS codes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Potential for a short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Provide information on the contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline