Skip to main content
Tenders

Provision of a Safety Access Systems Maintenance Measured Term Contract (MTC) (including Edge Protection) (2025-29)

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027378-2026
Value
£402,981
Location
West Central Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Budget
£402,981
Duration
Not specified
Location
West Central Scotland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The University of Strathclyde ("the University") is seeking to establish a Contract for the Provision of a Safety Access Systems Maintenance Measured Term Contract (MTC) (including Edge Protection) (2025-29) (UOS-36989-2025).

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for safety access systems maintenance is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the title is specific. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements within the provided text reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value and a deadline. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated, and the tender documents lack content summaries, hindering a full assessment.

Missing contract duration
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and criteria are objective in principle, though not explicitly detailed. E-procurement is indicated. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date, financing details, and the absence of document content reduce practical usability for potential bidders.

No e-submission (implied by lack of specific mention)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
Open procedure and e-procurement indicated
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of content in tender documents
Absence of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Include summaries or full content for all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline