Skip to main content
Tenders

ROOT to Market Dynamic Market for Regenerative Procurement

Open
Deadline
3657 days left
March 31, 2036
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022187-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2036

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2036

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Regeneration Over Extraction. Suppliers must seek to:  Prioritise materials and products that restore, replenish, or enhance natural living systems.  Avoid extractive materials that degrade ecosystems, deplete finite resources, or cause long term environmental harm.  Use resource efficiently and maximise material lifespans through good design and appropriate material use  Demonstrate a clear transition plan away from extractive inputs where alternatives are not yet available.  Minimise embodied carbon in construction materials (e.g., concrete, steel, insulation).  Prioritise regenerative or circular construction materials (e.g., reclaimed steel, recycled aggregates, lower embodied carbon concrete alternatives, timber from regenerative forestry).  Avoid extractive materials linked to high impact mining (e.g., virgin aggregates, aluminium, PVC).  Seek to design for deconstruction, enhancing the residual value of materials at the end of design life and reducing future reliance on extractive practices Ethical and Non-Exploitative Supply Chains. Suppliers must seek to:  Ensure all labour practices across their supply chain are fair, safe, and free from exploitation.  Avoid sourcing from suppliers or regions associated with forced labour, unsafe working conditions, or unfair pay.  Maintain transparent supply chain mapping and provide evidence of due diligence on request.  Ensure fair and safe working conditions on construction sites.2.3 Climate Friendly Operations. Suppliers must seek to:  Minimise carbon, water and waste in their organisations and core operations.  Specifically minimise greenhouse gas emissions across production, transport, and distribution.  Prioritise low carbon materials, renewable energy, and efficient logistics.  Minimise whole life carbon impacts in design and materials, optimising embodied carbon together with operational efficiency.  Reduce site emissions (plant, generators, transport) and use electric or low emission plant and machinery.  Implement site level water management and waste segregation plans.  Demonstrate continuous improvement in reducing their carbon footprint, water usage and waste production, supported by measurable data where possible.  Drive design towards deconstruction practices and offer (and advocate for) regenerative material options to replace more mainstream materials  Nature Enhancing Practices. Suppliers must seek to:  Adopt practices that actively improve soil health, biodiversity, water quality, and ecosystem resilience.  Use regenerative agricultural, manufacturing, or operational methods wherever feasible.  Avoid chemicals, processes, or materials known to harm biodiversity or natural habitats.  Implement nature positive site practices.  Ensure soil protection and restoration before and after works.  Avoid habitat disturbance and protect ecological features during construction. Circularity and Resource Stewardship. Suppliers must seek to:  Maximise recycled, reclaimed, or up-cycled materials.  Design products and packaging for reuse, repair, or recycling.  Minimise waste generation and avoid single use materials unless essential for safety or compliance.  Design for reuse, modularity and disassembly.  Maximise reuse of demolition materials.  Avoid single use construction materials (e.g. plastic sheeting)  Offer and opt for the use of bio-based and recovered materials wherever viably possible

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

37 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (33)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are explicitly stated in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS33
--Suppliers must seek to prioritise materials and products that restore, replenish, or enhance natural living systems.
--Suppliers must seek to avoid extractive materials that degrade ecosystems, deplete finite resources, or cause long term environmental harm.
--Suppliers must seek to use resource efficiently and maximise material lifespans through good design and appropriate material use.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are explicitly stated in the provided text beyond the general descriptions of desired practices.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are explicitly stated in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates strong sustainability focus and detailed requirements, but lacks crucial financial information and clear evaluation criteria, impacting its overall practicality and legal compliance.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender includes a proper CPV code and is classified as an open procedure. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date for financial information are significant omissions that could lead to legal challenges and reduce fairness in the process.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Missing reveal date for financial information
Clarity80/100

The description is exceptionally detailed, outlining extensive sustainability and ethical requirements. The criteria are well-documented and clearly described, providing a strong understanding of the desired outcomes.

Completeness70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, and a detailed description with extensive requirements are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are critical for bidders to assess their capacity and interest.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration missing
Fairness85/100

The requirements are very specific to sustainability and ethical sourcing, which, while commendable, are not tailored to specific companies. The dynamic market procedure, along with detailed requirements and generally disclosed nature of the tender, promotes a level playing field. However, the lack of disclosed value and clear evaluation criteria could be seen as detrimental to fairness.

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

While the description is rich, the lack of e-submission specified, absence of a contract start date, and the undefined financing information make the practical execution challenging for potential bidders. The submission deadline is very far in the future, which is unusual but not necessarily impractical on its own.

No e-submission specified
Contract start date missing
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and description are populated logically. The submission deadline is set very far in the future (2036), which is unusual but logically consistent within the data provided. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender strongly emphasizes green procurement, ethical supply chains, climate-friendly operations, nature enhancement, and circularity. This is a significant strength, exceeding standard requirements.

Strengths

Exceptional detail in sustainability and ethical requirements
Clear and comprehensive description of desired outcomes
Strong focus on green procurement and regenerative practices

Concerns

Lack of disclosed estimated value
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Missing contract start date and financing information

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria and weighting.
3. Specify the contract start date and financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline