Skip to main content
Tenders

Interior renovation works in preschool education institutions of Riga City Municipality (List 2)

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
169046
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Interior renovation works in preschool education institutions of Riga City Municipality (List 2)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted in Latvian.
--Bids must be submitted electronically through the Electronic Procurement System (EIS).
--The bid must include all required documents as specified in the tender documentation, including the technical proposal, financial proposal, and declarations.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not be subject to any of the exclusion grounds specified in the Public Procurement Law of Latvia.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be a legal entity or a natural person registered in accordance with the legislation of its country of registration.
--The bidder must have the necessary permits and licenses to carry out renovation works in preschool educational institutions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must have successfully completed at least [Number] similar renovation works in educational institutions within the last [Number] years.
--The bidder must provide a list of key personnel with their qualifications and experience in similar projects.
--The bidder must submit a technical proposal detailing the methodology, timeline, and resources for the renovation works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial capacity to undertake the project.
--The bidder must provide financial statements for the last [Number] years.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169046_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324153728.pdf -- 100.8 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a bid, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical proposal specifications, financial proposal details, and other necessary documents for the renovation of preschool educational institutions in Riga.

Tehniskā specifikācijaXLS
2026 PII iekštelpas 2saraksts APJ 3 obj.xlsx -- 193.1 KB

This document contains a technical specification detailing the costs for interior renovation works in preschool educational institutions of the Riga City Municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for interior renovation works in Riga's municipal preschool educational institutions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for interior renovation works in Riga's preschools is generally well-structured, but lacks transparency in financial details and evaluation criteria. While most essential information is present, the absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation methods slightly impacts fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including the use of CPV codes and a clear open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. No immediate red flags regarding regulatory compliance or disputes are apparent.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the existence of a technical specification and requirements document indicates documented requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of works, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The tender documents are available, but their full content might be restricted.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an e-procurement system, which promotes fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-submission through the Electronic Procurement System (EIS), which is practical. However, the AI-extracted requirements mention 'Restricted document access' which could hinder practical preparation. Financing information and contract start date are not explicitly detailed.

Restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear open procedure and CPV code
E-procurement system utilized
Reasonable submission deadline
Key documents (technical specification, requirements) available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline