Skip to main content
Tenders

Framework for the Supply of Lockable Mobile Phone Pouches

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027334-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Establish a multi-supplier framework for the supply of lockable mobile phone pouches, unlocking bases, and associated support services. The framework will support Police and Crime Commissioners (PCC) and their equivalents across the Country as well as schools, in enabling schools to create phone-free learning environments, while still allowing students access to their devices before and after the school day.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lockable mobile phone pouches is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks crucial details regarding financial value and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are noted, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor legal compliance challenges during the evaluation phase. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the framework's purpose and target beneficiaries (PCCs and schools) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the lack of specific technical details for the pouches and unlocking bases, and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, reduce overall clarity.

No document content available
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available, which significantly impacts completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The open procedure and the provision of a reference number contribute to fairness. The framework approach allows for multiple suppliers. However, the undisclosed value and the missing evaluation criteria prevent a full assessment of objective criteria, potentially impacting fairness for bidders.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the lack of document content makes it difficult to assess the practicality of preparing a submission. Financing information is not provided.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are common in modern tenders. It is not indicated if the tender is EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear framework objective and scope
Open procedure for broad participation
Defined contract duration and start date
Appropriate CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the framework.
2. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Provide access to the full tender documentation with clear content.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline