Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation and reconstruction of the Community Centre in Motycz Szlachecki

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00167805/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation and reconstruction of the Community Centre in Motycz Szlachecki

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de896a-7737-990f-056e-e50001aaa2ce.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the reconstruction and renovation of the Community House in Motycz Szlachecki, issued by the Municipality of Zaleszany.

przedmiar - roboty elektryczne.pdfPDF
przedmiar - roboty elektryczne.pdf -- 266.1 KB

No content extracted

zał. nr 12 do SWZ.pdfPDF
zał. nr 12 do SWZ.pdf

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the renovation of a community house is generally well-structured with a good number of supporting documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and indicating it's an active procurement. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance issues regarding transparency and procedural fairness.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the renovation is clear, and the requirements are documented through a substantial number of attached files. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which slightly reduces clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and a clear description of the work. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria impacts completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and utilizes e-procurement, promoting fairness. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for bidders. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the specific e-submission process details are not immediately clear from the provided information. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, reducing practicality.

No e-submission details
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these sustainability elements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation package
Clear project description and location
E-Procurement enabled
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing estimated value
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of financing details
No sustainability considerations mentioned

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Provide information on financing sources and contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline