Skip to main content
Tenders

Stoke-on-Trent Sustainability Park Energy Recovery Facility - Design, Build and Operate

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020531-2026
Value
£1,320,000,000
Location
Shropshire and Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 01, 2027

Budget
£1,320,000,000
Duration
350 months
Location
Shropshire and Staffordshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Stoke-on-Trent City Council seeks to procure a replacement Energy Recovery Facility (ERF) in Hanford, Stoke-on-Trent. The new ERF will have a capacity of 230,000-290,000 tonnes per annum on an 80% Council / 20% private sector ownership basis. The procurement includes Design and Build (D&B) and a 25-year Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contract. Key requirements include the design and build of a new ERF with moving grate combustion technology (or equivalent) and advanced flue-gas treatment systems, integration of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) technology to deliver low-carbon heat to the city's District Heat Network, and readiness for Carbon Capture. The facility must align with the Authority's Net Zero 2050 strategy. A full 25-year O&M service post-commissioning is required.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (11)
Technical (8)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-15T00:00:00.
--Bids must be provided in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds listed, but standard procurement exclusion criteria will likely apply.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Must be capable of designing and building a new Energy Recovery Facility (ERF).
--Must be capable of providing a 25-year Operations and Maintenance (O&M) service post-commissioning.
--Must be able to integrate Combined Heat and Power (CHP) technology.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Design and build of a new ERF with moving grate combustion technology (or equivalent).
--Design and build of advanced flue-gas treatment systems.
--Integration of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) technology.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 1,320,000,000 EUR.
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability to undertake a project of this scale and duration (350 months).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an Energy Recovery Facility is comprehensive, with a high estimated value and long contract duration. Key requirements are clearly outlined, but the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the potential for a short submission window are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. However, the submission deadline is relatively short given the project's scale and complexity, which could be a point of contention. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

Submission deadline may be too short for the project's scale.
Clarity80/100

The description of the Energy Recovery Facility, its capacity, ownership structure, and key technical requirements (moving grate, CHP, Carbon Capture Ready) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements further detail the expected capabilities. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the crucial tender documents are listed as having no content available, which significantly impacts completeness.

No document content available.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The requirements are generally objective and focused on technical capabilities and project outcomes. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of a competitive flexible procedure suggests a fair process.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents makes the submission process less practical. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, which could be a practical consideration for bidders.

No e-submission specified.
No document URL provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (contract start and duration) are logically consistent with the project's scope.

Sustainability50/100

While the project title and description mention 'Sustainability Park' and 'Net Zero 2050 strategy,' and 'low-carbon heat,' there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation beyond the inherent nature of an ERF and carbon capture readiness. It is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description.
High estimated value and long contract duration indicating significant project.
Specific technical requirements (CHP, Carbon Capture Ready).
Open tender procedure.

Concerns

No document content available.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Potentially short submission deadline.
Lack of e-submission details.

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with clear content.
2. Specify detailed evaluation criteria.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline or confirming its adequacy.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline