Provision of Services for Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Adult Population Survey (APS), Global and UK project

This tender for the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Adult Population Survey is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

The tender is active with a clear procedure type. While the CPV code is provided, the organization explicitly states it is not a contracting authority and is not subject to EU procurement regulations, which is a significant point. Deadlines are present, but the organization's voluntary advertising means strict regulatory compliance is not guaranteed. No disputes are noted.

The description of the service required is clear, outlining the need for an experienced provider in large-scale UK surveys using CATI and CAWI. The AI-extracted requirements are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the full tender documents are not directly accessible within the provided text, requiring redirection to an external portal, and no content summary is available.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. Requirements are focused on proven capability and experience, which are objective. The use of an e-procurement system (In-tend) is indicated. The deadline is reasonable given the context. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

The tender utilizes an e-procurement system for submission and queries. A contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not detailed. The primary practicality issue is the lack of direct access to tender documents within the provided information.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The contract start date is logically after the submission deadline. No suspension or disputes are reported, indicating good data integrity.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or AI-extracted requirements. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.