Skip to main content
Tenders

Delivery of one (1) chair scale and one (1) electronic scale with a height meter

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00170653/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Małopolskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Małopolskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of one (1) chair scale and one (1) electronic scale with a height meter

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a55-a4ce-9618-056e-e50001aab447.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the delivery of one chair scale and one electronic scale with a height meter by the Ludwik Rydygier Specialist Hospital in Krakow.

69 ZP 2026 SWZ.docxDOC
69 ZP 2026 SWZ.docx

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the delivery of one chair scale and one electronic scale with a height meter, conducted by the Ludwik Rydygier Specialist Hospital in Krakow.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for medical scales is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline is relatively short. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which could impact the transparency of the legal process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the required items (chair scale and electronic scale with height meter) is clear. The attached documents provide the necessary specifications and conditions. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria means the path to selection is not fully transparent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the estimated value of the procurement is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The tender documents are available.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. Access to documents is provided. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for some bidders. However, there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of disclosed financing information and the potentially short submission deadline might pose practical challenges for some bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.

Deadline may be too short
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The data appears consistent within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability drivers.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of required items
E-procurement utilized
All tender documents available
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline