SPS-02331 Grounds Maintenance Central Area

This tender offers a clear description of grounds maintenance services for multiple prison sites with a stated estimated value and duration. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements.

The tender appears to be compliant with standard open procedure regulations. A valid CPV code is provided, and no disputes are reported. Deadlines are specified, but the timeframe between the notice date and submission deadline could be considered short depending on the complexity of the submission.

The description of the required grounds maintenance services is clear and outlines the quality expectations. Technical capabilities are adequately defined. However, the absence of explicit submission and evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Basic tender information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The CPV code is provided. However, critical details like the full scope of documents, specific submission instructions, and explicit eligibility/financial requirements are missing from the provided extract, impacting completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes broad competition. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria appear objective based on the description. The 'Divided into Parts' characteristic could enhance fairness by allowing specialization, but specific criteria for this division are not detailed. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive indicator of modern practice. A contract start date is implied by the submission deadline but not explicitly stated. Financing information is not detailed, and while the contract duration is clear, the practicality is hindered by the lack of document access and detailed submission instructions.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated logically. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes. The dates provided are consistent with a current active tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability initiatives within this procurement.