Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Henson Villas Demolition

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024858-2026
Value
£264,000
Location
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 15, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£264,000
Duration
4 months
Location
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The client requires the demolition of Henson Villas in Pearson Park, Kingston Upon Hull. The site is within a residential and Conservation Area and opposite a public park. Henson Villas consists of three 2-storey blocks with eight flats contained in each block. Demolition is anticipated to commence July 2026.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for demolition work is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. The absence of disputes and suspensions contributes positively. The deadline is within a reasonable timeframe for a below-threshold tender.

Clarity80/100

The description of the demolition site and the nature of the work is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific submission requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the unavailability of document content significantly reduce completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern. There is no indication of tailored requirements for specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Value and deadline disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific requirements detailed
No document content available
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide full content for all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability and social value aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline