Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of a residential unit in a multi-family residential building at Batorego Street 63/1, administered by the Municipal Housing Administration in Tychy

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00149610/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of a residential unit in a multi-family residential building at Batorego Street 63/1, administered by the Municipal Housing Administration in Tychy

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7f55-7716-ae16-056e-e50001ac6b3b.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for construction works involving the renovation of a residential unit at Batorego 63/1 in Tychy, Poland.

SWZ z załącznikami.7zZIP
SWZ z załącznikami.7z

This document contains the Specification of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the renovation of a residential unit, including various annexes for bidders to complete.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for residential unit renovation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure and CPV code. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential for a short submission deadline (depending on local regulations for this type of tender) are minor concerns.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the renovation works is clear, and the requirements are documented within the provided SWZ. The conditions for participation are implicitly defined by the mandatory requirements.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with full document access and objective criteria implied by the mandatory requirements. The use of e-procurement is noted. The value not being disclosed is a minor point against full transparency.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs. However, the lack of disclosed financing information and contract duration limits its practicality for bidders.

Missing financing information
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is a missed opportunity for incorporating sustainability principles.

No explicit sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Availability of tender documents
E-procurement utilized
Well-defined CPV code

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Lack of explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Include details on contract duration and any sustainability requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline