Dismantling of existing elevator, supply and installation of new elevator at Pulkveža Oskara Kalpaka Street 9, Jelgava

This tender for elevator works in Jelgava is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes are reported. The procedure appears compliant with general procurement regulations.

The tender description is clear, outlining the scope of works. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are provided, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of works, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While essential documents are attached, the lack of financial value impacts completeness.

The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The contract duration is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access for all interested parties, which could impact fairness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is implied by the duration and submission deadline. However, the 'No e-submission' flag (contradictory to e-procurement characteristic) and lack of explicit financing information reduce practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.