Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

CWC25029 - Building Fabric Reactive Response Repairs

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022775-2026
Value
£4,608,000
Location
West Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£4,608,000
Duration
48 months
Location
West Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Wolverhampton City Council intends to procure a responsive building repair, maintenance and minor works contract for its public buildings and property portfolio, including any associated planned maintenance instructed under the contract. The portfolio currently consists of approximately 1,897 properties, including schools and educational centres, grounds and recreational facilities, public conveniences, cemeteries, residential properties, offices, courts, museums, galleries, theatres, libraries, markets, depots and industrial units. Properties may be added to or removed from the portfolio during the contract term. The contract will provide 24/7 reactive emergency, urgent and follow-on building fabric repairs, including making-safe works, glazing, fencing, carpentry, brick and stone repairs, roof repairs, drainage and gully works, scaffolding and associated minor works. Priority response requirements will include 1-hour emergency attendance, 24-hour urgent attendance and 7-day follow-on works. Works will generally exclude mechanical and electrical works except where ancillary to the instructed works. The contractor will be required to interface with the Council's systems and deliver robust reporting, asset data updates and KPI management throughout the contract term.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (13)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be capable of providing responsive building repair, maintenance, and minor works.
--Must be able to interface with the Council's systems.
--Must be able to deliver robust reporting, asset data updates, and KPI management.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS13
--Ability to provide 24/7 reactive emergency, urgent, and follow-on building fabric repairs.
--Ability to perform making-safe works.
--Ability to undertake glazing.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for building fabric repairs is generally well-structured with a clear description of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting completeness and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are noted. The 'Below threshold - open competition' procedure suggests adherence to relevant financial limits.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is detailed, outlining the scope of works, property portfolio, and response times. The requirements for technical capability are clearly extracted. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements reduce the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are described objectively, focusing on service delivery capabilities. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be a concern, but the absence of tailored requirements for specific companies is positive.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits the practicality for bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date is plausible following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of services
Open competition procedure
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Objective technical requirements

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Upload full tender documents with accessible URLs.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation elements into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline